Understanding user preferences and goals in recommender systems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

1 Citation (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recommender systems typically use collaborative filtering: information from your preferences (i.e. your ratings) is combined with that of other users to predict what other items you might also like. Much of the research in the field has focused on building algorithms that provide recommendations based purely on predicted accuracy [5]. However, these models make strong assumptions about how preferences come about, how stable they are, and how they can be measured [4]. Having a background in decision psychology I have studied how the preference elicitation methods of recommender systems can be better understood and improved based on psychological insights. I will illustrate this with an example of new choice-based preference interfaces we have developed. Users are more satisfied with a method that measures their preferences through a series of choices than with a rating-based preference elicitation, because the rating-based is more effortful and provides more obscure movies [2]. However, a drawback is that recommendation lists of choice-based preference elicitation contain mostly popular movies, and further research has investigated that showing trailers can help to reduce this popularity effect a bit as users are able to use the trailer to inspect less well-known items [3]. Moreover, recommender systems should also align with user goals. Many reallife recommender systems are evaluated mostly on (implicit) behavioral data such as clicks streams and viewing times. However, such an approach has limitations and I will show how a user-centric approach can help better understand why users are satisfied or not, for example why users prefer diversify over prediction accuracy as it reduces choice difficulty [8]. The behaviorist approach to evaluation also misses that users' short term goals (i.e. their current behavior) might not be representative of the goals they want to attain (i.e. their desired behavior) [1]. This is especially relevant in health and life style domains [6] where people are in need of support while changing their current behavior. I will elaborate on an example in the energy recommendation domain, and show how a different type of recommender approach and interface might help users to save more energy [7].

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Second Workshop on Engineering Computer-Human Interaction in Recommender Systems co-located with the 9th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS 2017)
PublisherCEUR-WS.org
Pages1-2
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
Event2nd Workshop on Engineering Computer-Human Interaction in Recommender Systems (EnCHIReS 2017) - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 26 Jun 2017 → …
Conference number: 2

Publication series

NameCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume1945
ISSN (Print)1613-0073

Conference

Conference2nd Workshop on Engineering Computer-Human Interaction in Recommender Systems (EnCHIReS 2017)
Abbreviated titleEnCHIReS 2017
CountryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period26/06/17 → …

Bibliographical note

keynote at the workshop

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding user preferences and goals in recommender systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this