Abstract
In this paper we analyze the role trust plays in an ethical evaluation of PT. We distinguish between trust in PT itself, and trust in those humans who design, produce and deploy it and draw on Discourse Ethics to further distinguish two types of communication embodied in PTs: asymmetrical and symmetrical communication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive 2012, 6-8 June 2012, Linkoping, Sweden |
| Editors | E. Ragnemalm, L., M. Bång |
| Place of Publication | Linköping |
| Publisher | Linköping University Electronic Press |
| Pages | 37-40 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Event | 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2012) - Linköping, Sweden Duration: 6 Jun 2012 → 8 Jun 2012 Conference number: 7 |
Conference
| Conference | 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2012) |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | PERSUASIVE 2012 |
| Country | Sweden |
| City | Linköping |
| Period | 6/06/12 → 8/06/12 |
| Other | "Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety" |