Transfer and templates in scientific modelling

Wybo Houkes (Corresponding author), Sjoerd D. Zwart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The notion of template has been advocated by Paul Humphreys and others as an illuminating unit of analysis in the philosophy of scientific modelling. Templates are supposed to have the dual functions of representing target systems and of facilitating quantitative manipulation. A resulting worry is that wide-ranging cross-disciplinary use of templates might compromise their representational function and reduce them to mere formalisms. In this paper, we argue that templates are valuable units of analysis in reconstructing cross-disciplinary modelling. Central to our discussion are the ways in which Lotka-Volterra models are used to analyse processes of technology diffusion. We illuminate both the similarities and differences between contributions to this case of cross-disciplinary modelling by reconstructing them as transfer of a template, without reducing the template to a mere formalism or a computational model. This requires differentiating the interpretation of templates from that of the models based on them. This differentiation allows us to claim that the LV models of technology diffusion that we review are the result of template transfer - conformist in some contributions, creative in others.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Modeling
Template
Cross-disciplinary
Computational Model
Philosophy
Manipulation
Formalism
Compromise

Cite this

@article{83a09b490f6f474f9c18fbce470159fd,
title = "Transfer and templates in scientific modelling",
abstract = "The notion of template has been advocated by Paul Humphreys and others as an illuminating unit of analysis in the philosophy of scientific modelling. Templates are supposed to have the dual functions of representing target systems and of facilitating quantitative manipulation. A resulting worry is that wide-ranging cross-disciplinary use of templates might compromise their representational function and reduce them to mere formalisms. In this paper, we argue that templates are valuable units of analysis in reconstructing cross-disciplinary modelling. Central to our discussion are the ways in which Lotka-Volterra models are used to analyse processes of technology diffusion. We illuminate both the similarities and differences between contributions to this case of cross-disciplinary modelling by reconstructing them as transfer of a template, without reducing the template to a mere formalism or a computational model. This requires differentiating the interpretation of templates from that of the models based on them. This differentiation allows us to claim that the LV models of technology diffusion that we review are the result of template transfer - conformist in some contributions, creative in others.",
author = "Wybo Houkes and Zwart, {Sjoerd D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.003",
language = "English",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Transfer and templates in scientific modelling. / Houkes, Wybo (Corresponding author); Zwart, Sjoerd D.

In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transfer and templates in scientific modelling

AU - Houkes, Wybo

AU - Zwart, Sjoerd D.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - The notion of template has been advocated by Paul Humphreys and others as an illuminating unit of analysis in the philosophy of scientific modelling. Templates are supposed to have the dual functions of representing target systems and of facilitating quantitative manipulation. A resulting worry is that wide-ranging cross-disciplinary use of templates might compromise their representational function and reduce them to mere formalisms. In this paper, we argue that templates are valuable units of analysis in reconstructing cross-disciplinary modelling. Central to our discussion are the ways in which Lotka-Volterra models are used to analyse processes of technology diffusion. We illuminate both the similarities and differences between contributions to this case of cross-disciplinary modelling by reconstructing them as transfer of a template, without reducing the template to a mere formalism or a computational model. This requires differentiating the interpretation of templates from that of the models based on them. This differentiation allows us to claim that the LV models of technology diffusion that we review are the result of template transfer - conformist in some contributions, creative in others.

AB - The notion of template has been advocated by Paul Humphreys and others as an illuminating unit of analysis in the philosophy of scientific modelling. Templates are supposed to have the dual functions of representing target systems and of facilitating quantitative manipulation. A resulting worry is that wide-ranging cross-disciplinary use of templates might compromise their representational function and reduce them to mere formalisms. In this paper, we argue that templates are valuable units of analysis in reconstructing cross-disciplinary modelling. Central to our discussion are the ways in which Lotka-Volterra models are used to analyse processes of technology diffusion. We illuminate both the similarities and differences between contributions to this case of cross-disciplinary modelling by reconstructing them as transfer of a template, without reducing the template to a mere formalism or a computational model. This requires differentiating the interpretation of templates from that of the models based on them. This differentiation allows us to claim that the LV models of technology diffusion that we review are the result of template transfer - conformist in some contributions, creative in others.

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 31701884

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

SN - 0039-3681

ER -