TY - JOUR
T1 - Transabdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the prostate
AU - Mischi, M.
AU - Demi, L.
AU - Smeenge, M.
AU - Kuenen, M.P.J.
AU - Postema, A.W.
AU - Rosette, de la, J.J.M.C.H.
AU - Wijkstra, H.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Numerous age-related pathologies affect the prostate gland, the most menacing of which is prostate cancer (PCa). The diagnostic tools for prostate investigation are invasive, requiring biopsies when PCa is suspected. Novel dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) imaging approaches have been proposed recently and appear promising for minimally invasive localization of PCa. Ultrasound imaging of the prostate is traditionally performed with a transrectal probe because the location of the prostate allows for high-resolution images using high-frequency transducers. However, DCE-US imaging requires lower frequencies to induce bubble resonance and, thus, improve contrast-to-tissue ratio. For this reason, in this study we investigate the feasibility of quantitative DCE-US imaging of the prostate via the abdomen. The study included 10 patients (age = 60.7 ± 5.7 y) referred for a needle biopsy study. After having given informed consent, patients underwent DCE-US with both transabdominal and transrectal probes. Time–intensity contrast curves were derived using both approaches and their model-fit quality was compared. Although further improvements are expected by optimization of the transabdominal settings, the results of transabdominal and transrectal DCE-US are closely comparable, confirming the feasibility of transabdominal DCE-US; transabdominal curve fitting revealed an average determination coefficient r2 = 0.91 (r2 > 0.75 for 78.6% of all prostate pixels) compared with r2 = 0.91 (r2 > 0.75 for 81.6% of all prostate pixels) by the transrectal approach. Replacing the transrectal approach with more acceptable transabdominal scanning for prostate investigation is feasible. This approach would improve patient comfort and represent a useful option for PCa localization and monitoring.
Key Words
Prostate cancer;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;
Ultrasound contrast agents;
Dilution curve;
Transabdominal ultrasound;
Transrectal ultrasound;
Perfusion
AB - Numerous age-related pathologies affect the prostate gland, the most menacing of which is prostate cancer (PCa). The diagnostic tools for prostate investigation are invasive, requiring biopsies when PCa is suspected. Novel dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) imaging approaches have been proposed recently and appear promising for minimally invasive localization of PCa. Ultrasound imaging of the prostate is traditionally performed with a transrectal probe because the location of the prostate allows for high-resolution images using high-frequency transducers. However, DCE-US imaging requires lower frequencies to induce bubble resonance and, thus, improve contrast-to-tissue ratio. For this reason, in this study we investigate the feasibility of quantitative DCE-US imaging of the prostate via the abdomen. The study included 10 patients (age = 60.7 ± 5.7 y) referred for a needle biopsy study. After having given informed consent, patients underwent DCE-US with both transabdominal and transrectal probes. Time–intensity contrast curves were derived using both approaches and their model-fit quality was compared. Although further improvements are expected by optimization of the transabdominal settings, the results of transabdominal and transrectal DCE-US are closely comparable, confirming the feasibility of transabdominal DCE-US; transabdominal curve fitting revealed an average determination coefficient r2 = 0.91 (r2 > 0.75 for 78.6% of all prostate pixels) compared with r2 = 0.91 (r2 > 0.75 for 81.6% of all prostate pixels) by the transrectal approach. Replacing the transrectal approach with more acceptable transabdominal scanning for prostate investigation is feasible. This approach would improve patient comfort and represent a useful option for PCa localization and monitoring.
Key Words
Prostate cancer;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;
Ultrasound contrast agents;
Dilution curve;
Transabdominal ultrasound;
Transrectal ultrasound;
Perfusion
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 25701535
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 41
SP - 1112
EP - 1118
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 4
ER -