Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime

R.P.J.M. Raven

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    98 Citations (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Abstract In the early 2000s Dutch electricity companies are increasingly investing in technologies that enable them to replace coal with biomass. Replacing large amounts of coal (up to 40%) requires the companies to invest in technological trajectories alternative to the ones they have supported over the past decades. This paper aims to understand why these incumbent firms in the Dutch electricity regime are developing alternatives. The second aim of the paper is to provide a way for assessing the potential of innovations. The paper does so by bringing together insights from literature on (socio-) technical regimes and insights from literature on technological and market niches (strategic niche management). The main conclusion is that both niche processes (at the level of experimenting with alternatives) and changes in the incumbent regime are necessary for understanding the innovation journey of a new technology. A two-by-two matrix is developed that can be used for both analysis and governance purposes. Keywords: Socio-technical regime; Strategic niche management; Technological trajectories; Biomass
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)581-595
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume35
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this