TY - JOUR
T1 - Theoretical comparison of packed bed and fluidized bed membrane reactors for methane reforming
AU - Gallucci, F.
AU - Sint Annaland, van, M.
AU - Kuipers, J.A.M.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In this theoretical work the performance of different membrane reactor concepts, both fluidized bed and packed bed membrane reactors, has been compared for ultra-pure hydrogen production via methane reforming. Using detailed theoretical models, the required membrane area to reach a given conversion and the prevailing temperature profiles have been compared. The extent of mass and heat transfer limitations in the different reactors has been evaluated, and strategies to decrease (or avoid) these limitations have been proposed for the fluidized bed membrane reactor concept. The results show that the packed bed membrane reactor requires in some conditions double membrane area with respect to the fluidized bed membrane reactor.
AB - In this theoretical work the performance of different membrane reactor concepts, both fluidized bed and packed bed membrane reactors, has been compared for ultra-pure hydrogen production via methane reforming. Using detailed theoretical models, the required membrane area to reach a given conversion and the prevailing temperature profiles have been compared. The extent of mass and heat transfer limitations in the different reactors has been evaluated, and strategies to decrease (or avoid) these limitations have been proposed for the fluidized bed membrane reactor concept. The results show that the packed bed membrane reactor requires in some conditions double membrane area with respect to the fluidized bed membrane reactor.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.050
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.050
M3 - Article
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 35
SP - 7142
EP - 7150
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 13
ER -