The value of relative quality in video delivery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Estimating perceived quality of video is typically done by gauging the user's response on an absolute scale of ratings (excellent, good, fair, poor and bad). However, the internal representation of these adjectives to the stimuli varies significantly in different people. Even though the goal is to make an absolute estimate of the perceived quality, these questions reveal merely relative tendencies due the incorporated bias and variability in the responses. We present results from quality assessment based on estimates of relative quality distances between samples, by asking the question in the form or comparison rather than rating. This, two-alternative forced choice method scales the differences in a form of psychometric function, which presents the utility of the perceived quality on a measurable objective value. We argue that this relativistic mapping with low variance is more useful in video delivery because it offers an accurate way to optimize the resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-162
JournalJournal of Mobile Multimedia
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The value of relative quality in video delivery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this