Abstract
In this paper we explore the persuasive effects of social feedback, as provided by an embodied agent, on behavioral change. In a lab setting an experiment was conducted in which participants had the opportunity to conserve energy while carrying out washing tasks with a simulated washing machine. The experiment tested the effect of positive and negative social feedback and compared these effects to more widely used factual feedback. The robotic source, a so-called iCat, was manipulated with regard to its
perceived agency. The results showed an effect of social feedback compared to factual feedback. In addition an effect of feedback valence was found, demonstrating more
conservation actions following negative social feedback. The predicted perceived agency effect could not be demonstrated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Poster proceedings of Persuasive 2008 |
| Place of Publication | Oulu, Finland |
| Publisher | University of Oulu |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | 3rd International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2008) - Oulu, Finland Duration: 4 Jun 2008 → 6 Jun 2008 Conference number: 3 |
Conference
| Conference | 3rd International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2008) |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | PERSUASIVE 2008 |
| Country/Territory | Finland |
| City | Oulu |
| Period | 4/06/08 → 6/06/08 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The persuasive effects of positive and negative social feedback from an embodied agent on energy conservation behavior.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver