The OARSI core set of performance-based measures for knee osteoarthritis is reliable but not valid and responsive

J.J. Tolk (Corresponding author), R.P.A. Janssen, C.A.C. Prinsen, D.A.J.M. Latijnhouwers, M.C. van der Steen, S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, M. Reijman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

42 Citations (SciVal)
243 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Osteoarthritis Research Society International has identified a core set of performance-based tests of physical function for use in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The core set consists of the 30-second chair stand test (30-s CST), 4 × 10 m fast-paced walk test (40 m FPWT) and a stair climb test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of these performance-based measures to assess the ability to measure physical function in knee OA patients.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 85 knee OA patients indicated for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed by testing of predefined hypotheses. A subgroup (n = 30) underwent test-retest measurements for reliability analysis. The Oxford Knee Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, pain during activity score and knee extensor strength were used as comparator instruments. Measurements were obtained at baseline and 12 months after TKA.

RESULTS: Appropriate test-retest reliability was found for all three tests. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the 30-s CST was 0.90 (95% CI 0.68; 0.96), 40 m FPWT 0.93 (0.85; 0.96) and for the 10-step stair climb test (10-step SCT) 0.94 (0.89; 0.97). Adequate construct validity could not be confirmed for the three tests. For the 30-s CST, 42% of the predefined hypotheses were confirmed; for the 40 m FPWT, 27% and for the 10-step SCT 36% were confirmed. The 40 m FPWT was found to be responsive with 75% of predefined hypothesis confirmed, whereas the responsiveness for the other tests could not be confirmed. For the 30 s CST and 10-step SCT, only 50% of hypotheses were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS: The three performance-based tests had good reliability, but poor construct validity and responsiveness in the assessment of function for the domains sit-to-stand movement, walking short distances and stair negotiation. The findings of the present study do not justify their use for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1. Diagnostic study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2898-2909
Number of pages12
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume27
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

Keywords

  • Functional outcome
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Performance-based measures
  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Prospective Studies
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis
  • Pain/surgery
  • Male
  • Exercise Test
  • Time Factors
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Female
  • Knee Joint/physiopathology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/standards
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Walking
  • Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Walk Test
  • Preoperative Period

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The OARSI core set of performance-based measures for knee osteoarthritis is reliable but not valid and responsive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this