The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

M. Amerongen, van

doi:10.6100/IR636331

The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

M. Amerongen, van

Research output: Thesis › Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e)

1475 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

Original language	English
Qualification	Doctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution	Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences
Supervisors/Advisors	Meijers, Anthonie W.M., Promotor Illies, Christian, Copromotor
Award date	19 Aug 2008
Place of Publication	Eindhoven
Publisher	Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Print ISBNs	978-90-386-1339-0
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.6100/IR636331
Publication status	Published - 2008

Bibliographical note

Proefschrift.

Access to Document

10.6100/IR636331

200811190Final published version, 1.23 MB

Cite this

@phdthesis{2054c97014344abb9e20b7cf1ef00c3b,

title = "The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance",

abstract = "The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett{\textquoteright}s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.",

author = "{Amerongen, van}, M.",

note = "Proefschrift.",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.6100/IR636331",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-90-386-1339-0",

publisher = "Technische Universiteit Eindhoven",

type = "Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e)",

school = "Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences",

}

TY - THES

T1 - The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

AU - Amerongen, van, M.

N1 - Proefschrift.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

AB - The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

U2 - 10.6100/IR636331

DO - 10.6100/IR636331

M3 - Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e)

SN - 978-90-386-1339-0

PB - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

CY - Eindhoven

ER -

The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this