The Hartwick rule: Myths and facts

G.B. Asheim, W. Buchholz, C.A.A.M. Withagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We shed light on the Hartwick rule for capital accumulation and resource depletion by providing semantic clarifications and investigating the implications and relevance of this rule. We extend earlier results by establishing that the Hartwick rule does not indicate sustainability and does not require substitutability between man-made and naturalcapital. We use a new class of simple counterexamples (i) to obtain the novel finding that a negative value of net investments need not entail that utility is unsustainable, and (ii) to point out deficiencies in the literature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-150
JournalEnvironmental and Resource Economics
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Hartwick rule: Myths and facts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this