The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender

H.S.M. Cramer, V. Evers, S. Ramlal, M.W. Someren, van, L.W. Rutledge, N. Stash, L.M. Aroyo, B.J. Wielinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

134 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The increasing availability of (digital) cultural heritage artefacts offers great potential for increased access to art content, but also necessitates tools to help users deal with such abundance of information. User-adaptive art recommender systems aim to present their users with art content tailored to their interests. These systems try to adapt to the user based on feedback from the user on which artworks he or she finds interesting. Users need to be able to depend on the system to competently adapt to their feedback and find the artworks that are most interesting to them. This paper investigates the influence of transparency on user trust in and acceptance of content-based recommender systems. A between-subject experiment (N = 60) evaluated interaction with three versions of a content-based art recommender in the cultural heritage domain. This recommender system provides users with artworks that are of interest to them, based on their ratings of other artworks. Version 1 was not transparent, version 2 explained to the user why a recommendation had been made and version 3 showed a rating of how certain the system was that a recommendation would be of interest to the user. Results show that explaining to the user why a recommendation was made increased acceptance of the recommendations. Trust in the system itself was not improved by transparency. Showing how certain the system was of a recommendation did not influence trust and acceptance. A number of guidelines for design of recommender systems in the cultural heritage domain have been derived from the study’s results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-496
JournalUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Recommender systems
Transparency
transparency
acceptance
art
Feedback
cultural heritage
Availability
rating
Experiments
artifact

Cite this

Cramer, H. S. M., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., Someren, van, M. W., Rutledge, L. W., Stash, N., ... Wielinga, B. J. (2008). The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(5), 455-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3
Cramer, H.S.M. ; Evers, V. ; Ramlal, S. ; Someren, van, M.W. ; Rutledge, L.W. ; Stash, N. ; Aroyo, L.M. ; Wielinga, B.J. / The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 455-496.
@article{7a70e58deb8a4a3fa11fb0ab3aa0848c,
title = "The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender",
abstract = "The increasing availability of (digital) cultural heritage artefacts offers great potential for increased access to art content, but also necessitates tools to help users deal with such abundance of information. User-adaptive art recommender systems aim to present their users with art content tailored to their interests. These systems try to adapt to the user based on feedback from the user on which artworks he or she finds interesting. Users need to be able to depend on the system to competently adapt to their feedback and find the artworks that are most interesting to them. This paper investigates the influence of transparency on user trust in and acceptance of content-based recommender systems. A between-subject experiment (N = 60) evaluated interaction with three versions of a content-based art recommender in the cultural heritage domain. This recommender system provides users with artworks that are of interest to them, based on their ratings of other artworks. Version 1 was not transparent, version 2 explained to the user why a recommendation had been made and version 3 showed a rating of how certain the system was that a recommendation would be of interest to the user. Results show that explaining to the user why a recommendation was made increased acceptance of the recommendations. Trust in the system itself was not improved by transparency. Showing how certain the system was of a recommendation did not influence trust and acceptance. A number of guidelines for design of recommender systems in the cultural heritage domain have been derived from the study’s results.",
author = "H.S.M. Cramer and V. Evers and S. Ramlal and {Someren, van}, M.W. and L.W. Rutledge and N. Stash and L.M. Aroyo and B.J. Wielinga",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "455--496",
journal = "User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction",
issn = "0924-1868",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

Cramer, HSM, Evers, V, Ramlal, S, Someren, van, MW, Rutledge, LW, Stash, N, Aroyo, LM & Wielinga, BJ 2008, 'The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender', User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 455-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3

The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. / Cramer, H.S.M.; Evers, V.; Ramlal, S.; Someren, van, M.W.; Rutledge, L.W.; Stash, N.; Aroyo, L.M.; Wielinga, B.J.

In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2008, p. 455-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender

AU - Cramer, H.S.M.

AU - Evers, V.

AU - Ramlal, S.

AU - Someren, van, M.W.

AU - Rutledge, L.W.

AU - Stash, N.

AU - Aroyo, L.M.

AU - Wielinga, B.J.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The increasing availability of (digital) cultural heritage artefacts offers great potential for increased access to art content, but also necessitates tools to help users deal with such abundance of information. User-adaptive art recommender systems aim to present their users with art content tailored to their interests. These systems try to adapt to the user based on feedback from the user on which artworks he or she finds interesting. Users need to be able to depend on the system to competently adapt to their feedback and find the artworks that are most interesting to them. This paper investigates the influence of transparency on user trust in and acceptance of content-based recommender systems. A between-subject experiment (N = 60) evaluated interaction with three versions of a content-based art recommender in the cultural heritage domain. This recommender system provides users with artworks that are of interest to them, based on their ratings of other artworks. Version 1 was not transparent, version 2 explained to the user why a recommendation had been made and version 3 showed a rating of how certain the system was that a recommendation would be of interest to the user. Results show that explaining to the user why a recommendation was made increased acceptance of the recommendations. Trust in the system itself was not improved by transparency. Showing how certain the system was of a recommendation did not influence trust and acceptance. A number of guidelines for design of recommender systems in the cultural heritage domain have been derived from the study’s results.

AB - The increasing availability of (digital) cultural heritage artefacts offers great potential for increased access to art content, but also necessitates tools to help users deal with such abundance of information. User-adaptive art recommender systems aim to present their users with art content tailored to their interests. These systems try to adapt to the user based on feedback from the user on which artworks he or she finds interesting. Users need to be able to depend on the system to competently adapt to their feedback and find the artworks that are most interesting to them. This paper investigates the influence of transparency on user trust in and acceptance of content-based recommender systems. A between-subject experiment (N = 60) evaluated interaction with three versions of a content-based art recommender in the cultural heritage domain. This recommender system provides users with artworks that are of interest to them, based on their ratings of other artworks. Version 1 was not transparent, version 2 explained to the user why a recommendation had been made and version 3 showed a rating of how certain the system was that a recommendation would be of interest to the user. Results show that explaining to the user why a recommendation was made increased acceptance of the recommendations. Trust in the system itself was not improved by transparency. Showing how certain the system was of a recommendation did not influence trust and acceptance. A number of guidelines for design of recommender systems in the cultural heritage domain have been derived from the study’s results.

U2 - 10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3

DO - 10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 455

EP - 496

JO - User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

JF - User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

SN - 0924-1868

IS - 5

ER -