The dynamics of moral progress

Julia Hermann (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Assuming that there is moral progress, and assuming that the abolition of slavery is an example of it, how does moral progress occur? Is it mainly driven by specific individuals who have gained new moral insights, or by changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions in which agents morally judge the norms and practices of their society, and act upon these judgements? In this paper, I argue that moral progress is a complex process in which changes at the level of belief and changes at the level of institutions and social practices are deeply intertwined, and that changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions of moral agency constitute the main motor of moral progress. I develop my view of moral progress by way of grappling with Michelle Moody-Adams’ prominent philosophical account of it. My view is less intellectualistic and individualistic than hers, does not presuppose meta-ethical moral realism, and blurs her distinction between moral progress in beliefs and moral progress in social practices. I point out the limits of humans to progress morally, which are partly grounded in our evolutionary history, and argue that moral progress is always of a ‘local’ nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-311
Number of pages12
JournalRatio
Volume32
Issue number4
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Social Practice
Economics
Evolutionary
Abolition of Slavery
Moral Agency
History
Moral Realism

Keywords

  • Michelle Moody-Adams
  • evolution
  • moral progress
  • moral realism slavery
  • social practices

Cite this

Hermann, Julia. / The dynamics of moral progress. In: Ratio. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 300-311.
@article{2dd9da271dcb4defa24a8ec973027d3a,
title = "The dynamics of moral progress",
abstract = "Assuming that there is moral progress, and assuming that the abolition of slavery is an example of it, how does moral progress occur? Is it mainly driven by specific individuals who have gained new moral insights, or by changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions in which agents morally judge the norms and practices of their society, and act upon these judgements? In this paper, I argue that moral progress is a complex process in which changes at the level of belief and changes at the level of institutions and social practices are deeply intertwined, and that changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions of moral agency constitute the main motor of moral progress. I develop my view of moral progress by way of grappling with Michelle Moody-Adams’ prominent philosophical account of it. My view is less intellectualistic and individualistic than hers, does not presuppose meta-ethical moral realism, and blurs her distinction between moral progress in beliefs and moral progress in social practices. I point out the limits of humans to progress morally, which are partly grounded in our evolutionary history, and argue that moral progress is always of a ‘local’ nature.",
keywords = "Michelle Moody-Adams, evolution, moral progress, moral realism slavery, social practices",
author = "Julia Hermann",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rati.12232",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "300--311",
journal = "Ratio",
issn = "0034-0006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The dynamics of moral progress. / Hermann, Julia (Corresponding author).

In: Ratio, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 300-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamics of moral progress

AU - Hermann, Julia

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Assuming that there is moral progress, and assuming that the abolition of slavery is an example of it, how does moral progress occur? Is it mainly driven by specific individuals who have gained new moral insights, or by changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions in which agents morally judge the norms and practices of their society, and act upon these judgements? In this paper, I argue that moral progress is a complex process in which changes at the level of belief and changes at the level of institutions and social practices are deeply intertwined, and that changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions of moral agency constitute the main motor of moral progress. I develop my view of moral progress by way of grappling with Michelle Moody-Adams’ prominent philosophical account of it. My view is less intellectualistic and individualistic than hers, does not presuppose meta-ethical moral realism, and blurs her distinction between moral progress in beliefs and moral progress in social practices. I point out the limits of humans to progress morally, which are partly grounded in our evolutionary history, and argue that moral progress is always of a ‘local’ nature.

AB - Assuming that there is moral progress, and assuming that the abolition of slavery is an example of it, how does moral progress occur? Is it mainly driven by specific individuals who have gained new moral insights, or by changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions in which agents morally judge the norms and practices of their society, and act upon these judgements? In this paper, I argue that moral progress is a complex process in which changes at the level of belief and changes at the level of institutions and social practices are deeply intertwined, and that changes in the socio-economic and epistemic conditions of moral agency constitute the main motor of moral progress. I develop my view of moral progress by way of grappling with Michelle Moody-Adams’ prominent philosophical account of it. My view is less intellectualistic and individualistic than hers, does not presuppose meta-ethical moral realism, and blurs her distinction between moral progress in beliefs and moral progress in social practices. I point out the limits of humans to progress morally, which are partly grounded in our evolutionary history, and argue that moral progress is always of a ‘local’ nature.

KW - Michelle Moody-Adams

KW - evolution

KW - moral progress

KW - moral realism slavery

KW - social practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074888329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rati.12232

DO - 10.1111/rati.12232

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 300

EP - 311

JO - Ratio

JF - Ratio

SN - 0034-0006

IS - 4

ER -