The costs and benefits of replication studies

Nicholas Coles, Leonid Tiokhin, A.M. Scheel, P. Isager, D. Lakens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

117 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere124
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making

Cite this

@article{d49b86edfb6f4180a7b4f86870ea6144,
title = "The costs and benefits of replication studies",
abstract = "The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.",
author = "Nicholas Coles and Leonid Tiokhin and A.M. Scheel and P. Isager and D. Lakens",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.17605/OSF.IO/C8AKJ",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

The costs and benefits of replication studies. / Coles, Nicholas; Tiokhin, Leonid; Scheel, A.M.; Isager, P.; Lakens, D.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, e124, 27.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The costs and benefits of replication studies

AU - Coles, Nicholas

AU - Tiokhin, Leonid

AU - Scheel, A.M.

AU - Isager, P.

AU - Lakens, D.

PY - 2018/7/27

Y1 - 2018/7/27

N2 - The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.

AB - The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.

U2 - 10.17605/OSF.IO/C8AKJ

DO - 10.17605/OSF.IO/C8AKJ

M3 - Article

C2 - 31064512

VL - 41

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

M1 - e124

ER -