Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability

Jaime Bonnin Roca (Corresponding author), Parth Vaishnav, M. Granger Morgan, Erica Fuchs, Joana Mendonça

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Long-term public support may encourage the diffusion of emerging technologies by coordinating the generation of knowledge and providing patient funding, but unexpected policy changes may hinder private investment and even lead to situations of technology lockout. Leveraging archival data; insights from 45 interviews across academia, industry, and government; and 75 hours of participant observations, we develop insights about why institutional instability in Portugal affected the adoption of Polymer Additive Manufacturing (PAM) and Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) differently. In both cases, Portugal invested in the technology relatively early. While PAM has been widely adopted, including increasingly in high-tech applications, MAM adoption has been modest despite MAM's potential to greatly improve the performance and competitiveness of metal molds. From the comparison between PAM and MAM, we generate theory about technological and contextual factors that affect ‘technological forgiveness’, defined as the resilience of a new technology's adoption to institutional instability.
Original languageEnglish
Article number120599
Number of pages19
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume166
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this