Abstract
This research investigates the suitability of Polytopic Linear Models (PLMs)
for the analysis, modelling and control of a class of nonlinear dynamical systems.
The PLM structure is introduced as an approximate and alternative
description of nonlinear dynamical systems for the benefit of system analysis
and controller design. The model structure possesses three properties that we
would like to exploit.
Firstly, a PLM is build upon a number of linear models, each one of which
describes the system locally within a so-called operating regime. If these
models are combined in an appropriate way, that is by taking operating point
dependent convex combinations of parameter values that belong to the different
linear models, then a PLM will result. Consequently, the parameter
values of a PLM vary within a polytope, and the vertices of this polytope are
the parameter values that belong to the different linear models. A PLM owes
its name to this feature. Accordingly, a PLM can be interpreted on the basis
of a regime decomposition. Secondly, since a PLM is based on several linear
models, it is possible to describe the nonlinear system more globally compared
to only a single linear model. Thirdly, it is demonstrated that, under the appropriate
conditions, nonlinear systems can be approximated arbitrary close
by a PLM, parametrized with a finite number of parameters. There will be
given an upper bound for the number of required parameters, that is sufficient
to achieve the prescribed desired accuracy of the approximation.
An important motivation for considering PLMs rests on its structural similarities
with linear models. Linear systems are well understood, and the
accompanying system and control theory is well developed. Whether or not
the control related system properties such as stability, controllability etcetera,
are fulfilled, can be demonstrated by means of (often relatively simple) mathematical
manipulations on the linear system’s parameterization. Controller
design can often be automated and founded on the parameterization and the
control objective. Think of control laws based on stability, optimality and so
on. For nonlinear systems this is only partly the case, and therefore further
development of system and control theory is of major importance. In view
of the similarities between a linear model and a PLM, the expectation exists
that one can benefit from (results and concepts of) the well developed linear
system and control theory. This hypothesis is partly confirmed by the results
of this study.
Under the appropriate conditions, and through a simple analysis of the
parametrization of a PLM, it is possible to establish from a control perspective
relevant system properties. One of these properties is stability. Under the
appropriate conditions stability of the PLM implies stability of the system.
Moreover, a few easy to check conditions are derived concerning the notion
of controllability and observability. It has to be noticed however, that these
conditions apply to a class of PLMs of which the structure is further restricted.
The determination of system properties from a PLM is done with the
intention to derive a suitable model, and in particular to design a model based
controller. This study describes several constructive methods that aim at
building a PLM representation of the real system.
On the basis of a PLM several control laws are formulated. The main
objective of these control laws is to stabilize the system in a desired operating
point. A few computerized stabilizing control designs, that additionally aim
at optimality or robustness, are the outcome of this research.
The entire route of representing a system with an approximate PLM, subsequently
analyzing the PLM, and finally controlling the system by a PLM
based control design is illustrated by means of several examples. These examples
include experimental as well as simulation studies, and nonlinear dynamic
(mechanical) systems are the subject of research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 6 Feb 2001 |
Place of Publication | Eindhoven |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 90-386-2672-X |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2001 |