Stabilized lifting steps in noise reduction for non-equispaced samples

E. Vanraes, A. Bultheel, M.H. Jansen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper discusses wavelet thresholding in smoothing from non-equispaced, noisy data in one dimension. To deal with the irregularity of the grid we use so called second generation wavelets, based on the lifting scheme. We explain that a good numerical condition is an absolute requisite for successful thresholding. If this condition is not satisfied the output signal can show an arbitrary bias. We examine the nature and origin of stability problems in second generation wavelet transforms. The investigation concentrates on lifting with interpolating prediction, but the conclusions are extendible. The stability problem is a cumulated effect of the three successive steps in a lifting scheme: split, predict and update. The paper proposes three ways to stabilize the second generation wavelet transform. The first is a change in update and reduces the influence of the previous steps. The second is a change in prediction and operates on the interval boundaries. The third is a change in splitting procedure and concentrates on the irregularity of the data points. Illustrations show that reconstruction from thresholded coefficients with this stabilized second generation wavelet transform leads to smooth and close fits
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWavelets : Applications in Signal and Image Processing IX, San Diego, CA, USA | July 29, 2001
    EditorsA. Aldroubi, A. Laine, M. Unser
    Place of PublicationBellingham
    PublisherSPIE
    Pages105-116
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Publication series

    NameProceedings of SPIE
    Volume4478
    ISSN (Print)0277-786X

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Stabilized lifting steps in noise reduction for non-equispaced samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this