Spatio-chromatic sensitivity explained by post-receptoral contrast

Marcel Lucassen, Marc Lambooij, Dragan Sekulovski, Ingrid Vogels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We measured and modeled visibility thresholds of spatial chromatic sine-wave gratings at isoluminance. In two experiments we manipulated the base color, direction of chromatic modulation, spatial frequency, the number of cycles in the grating, and grating orientation. In Experiment 1 (18 participants) we studied four chromatic modulation directions around three base colors, for spatial frequencies 0.15-5 cycles/deg. Results show that the location, size and orientation of fitted ellipses through the observer-averaged thresholds varied with spatial frequency and base color. As expected, visibility threshold decreased with decreasing spatial frequency, except for the lowest spatial frequency, for which the number of cycles was only three. In Experiment 2 (27 participants) we investigated the effect of the number of cycles at spatial frequencies down to 0.025 cycles/deg. This showed that the threshold elevation at 0.15 cycles/deg in Experiment 1 was at least partly explained by the small number of cycles. We developed two types of chromatic detection models and fitted these to the threshold data. Both models incorporate probability summation across spatially weighted chromatic contrast signals, but differ in the stage at which the contrast signal is calculated. In one, chromatic contrast is determined at the cone receptor level, the dominant procedure in literature. In the other model, it is determined at a postreceptoral level, that is, after cone signals have been transformed into chromatic-opponent channels. We applied Akaike's Information Criterion to compare the performance of the models and calculated their relative probabilities and evidence ratios. We found evidence in favor of the second model and conclude that postreceptoral contrast is the most accurate determinant for chromatic contrast sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Color
Contrast Sensitivity

Keywords

  • Chromatic contrast sensitivity
  • Model comparison
  • Postreceptoral contrast
  • Probability summation
  • Visibility threshold

Cite this

Lucassen, Marcel ; Lambooij, Marc ; Sekulovski, Dragan ; Vogels, Ingrid. / Spatio-chromatic sensitivity explained by post-receptoral contrast. In: Journal of Vision. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 5.
@article{573e60d26ed047f582b3be368cf85626,
title = "Spatio-chromatic sensitivity explained by post-receptoral contrast",
abstract = "We measured and modeled visibility thresholds of spatial chromatic sine-wave gratings at isoluminance. In two experiments we manipulated the base color, direction of chromatic modulation, spatial frequency, the number of cycles in the grating, and grating orientation. In Experiment 1 (18 participants) we studied four chromatic modulation directions around three base colors, for spatial frequencies 0.15-5 cycles/deg. Results show that the location, size and orientation of fitted ellipses through the observer-averaged thresholds varied with spatial frequency and base color. As expected, visibility threshold decreased with decreasing spatial frequency, except for the lowest spatial frequency, for which the number of cycles was only three. In Experiment 2 (27 participants) we investigated the effect of the number of cycles at spatial frequencies down to 0.025 cycles/deg. This showed that the threshold elevation at 0.15 cycles/deg in Experiment 1 was at least partly explained by the small number of cycles. We developed two types of chromatic detection models and fitted these to the threshold data. Both models incorporate probability summation across spatially weighted chromatic contrast signals, but differ in the stage at which the contrast signal is calculated. In one, chromatic contrast is determined at the cone receptor level, the dominant procedure in literature. In the other model, it is determined at a postreceptoral level, that is, after cone signals have been transformed into chromatic-opponent channels. We applied Akaike's Information Criterion to compare the performance of the models and calculated their relative probabilities and evidence ratios. We found evidence in favor of the second model and conclude that postreceptoral contrast is the most accurate determinant for chromatic contrast sensitivity.",
keywords = "Chromatic contrast sensitivity, Model comparison, Postreceptoral contrast, Probability summation, Visibility threshold",
author = "Marcel Lucassen and Marc Lambooij and Dragan Sekulovski and Ingrid Vogels",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/18.5.13",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Spatio-chromatic sensitivity explained by post-receptoral contrast. / Lucassen, Marcel; Lambooij, Marc; Sekulovski, Dragan; Vogels, Ingrid.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 18, No. 5, 13, 01.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatio-chromatic sensitivity explained by post-receptoral contrast

AU - Lucassen, Marcel

AU - Lambooij, Marc

AU - Sekulovski, Dragan

AU - Vogels, Ingrid

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - We measured and modeled visibility thresholds of spatial chromatic sine-wave gratings at isoluminance. In two experiments we manipulated the base color, direction of chromatic modulation, spatial frequency, the number of cycles in the grating, and grating orientation. In Experiment 1 (18 participants) we studied four chromatic modulation directions around three base colors, for spatial frequencies 0.15-5 cycles/deg. Results show that the location, size and orientation of fitted ellipses through the observer-averaged thresholds varied with spatial frequency and base color. As expected, visibility threshold decreased with decreasing spatial frequency, except for the lowest spatial frequency, for which the number of cycles was only three. In Experiment 2 (27 participants) we investigated the effect of the number of cycles at spatial frequencies down to 0.025 cycles/deg. This showed that the threshold elevation at 0.15 cycles/deg in Experiment 1 was at least partly explained by the small number of cycles. We developed two types of chromatic detection models and fitted these to the threshold data. Both models incorporate probability summation across spatially weighted chromatic contrast signals, but differ in the stage at which the contrast signal is calculated. In one, chromatic contrast is determined at the cone receptor level, the dominant procedure in literature. In the other model, it is determined at a postreceptoral level, that is, after cone signals have been transformed into chromatic-opponent channels. We applied Akaike's Information Criterion to compare the performance of the models and calculated their relative probabilities and evidence ratios. We found evidence in favor of the second model and conclude that postreceptoral contrast is the most accurate determinant for chromatic contrast sensitivity.

AB - We measured and modeled visibility thresholds of spatial chromatic sine-wave gratings at isoluminance. In two experiments we manipulated the base color, direction of chromatic modulation, spatial frequency, the number of cycles in the grating, and grating orientation. In Experiment 1 (18 participants) we studied four chromatic modulation directions around three base colors, for spatial frequencies 0.15-5 cycles/deg. Results show that the location, size and orientation of fitted ellipses through the observer-averaged thresholds varied with spatial frequency and base color. As expected, visibility threshold decreased with decreasing spatial frequency, except for the lowest spatial frequency, for which the number of cycles was only three. In Experiment 2 (27 participants) we investigated the effect of the number of cycles at spatial frequencies down to 0.025 cycles/deg. This showed that the threshold elevation at 0.15 cycles/deg in Experiment 1 was at least partly explained by the small number of cycles. We developed two types of chromatic detection models and fitted these to the threshold data. Both models incorporate probability summation across spatially weighted chromatic contrast signals, but differ in the stage at which the contrast signal is calculated. In one, chromatic contrast is determined at the cone receptor level, the dominant procedure in literature. In the other model, it is determined at a postreceptoral level, that is, after cone signals have been transformed into chromatic-opponent channels. We applied Akaike's Information Criterion to compare the performance of the models and calculated their relative probabilities and evidence ratios. We found evidence in favor of the second model and conclude that postreceptoral contrast is the most accurate determinant for chromatic contrast sensitivity.

KW - Chromatic contrast sensitivity

KW - Model comparison

KW - Postreceptoral contrast

KW - Probability summation

KW - Visibility threshold

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047510186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/18.5.13

DO - 10.1167/18.5.13

M3 - Article

C2 - 29904788

AN - SCOPUS:85047510186

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 5

M1 - 13

ER -