The paper contains a comparison of solution techniques for Markov decision processes with respect to the total reward criterion. It is illustrated by examples that the effect of a number of improvements of the standard iterative method, which are advocated in the literature, is limited in some realistic situations. Numerical evidence is provided to show that exploiting the structure of the problem under consideration often yields a more substantial reduction of the required computational effort than some of the existing acceleration procedures. We advocate that this structure should be analyzed and used in choosing the appropriate solution procedure. This procedure might be composed by blending several of the acceleration concepts that are described in literature. Four test problems are sketched and solved with several successive approximation methods. These methods were composed after analyzing the structure of the problem. The required computational efforts are compared.
| Name | Memorandum COSOR |
|---|
| Volume | 8020 |
|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 0926-4493 |
|---|