SOLPS-ITER validation with TCV L-mode discharges

M. Wensing (Corresponding author), H. Reimerdes, O. Février, C. Colandrea, L. Martinelli, K. Verhaegh, F. Bagnato, P. Blanchard, B. Vincent, A. Perek, S. Gorno, H. De Oliveira, C. Theiler, B. P. Duval, C. K. Tsui, M. Baquero-Ruiz, M. Wischmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


This work presents a quantitative test of SOLPS-ITER simulations against tokamak à configuration variable (TCV) L-mode experiments. These simulations account for drifts, currents, kinetic neutrals, and carbon impurities providing the most complete edge transport simulations for TCV to date. The comparison is performed on nominally identical discharges carried out to assess the effectiveness of TCV's divertor baffles in the framework of the European Plasma Exhaust program and employs numerous edge diagnostics providing a detailed code-experiment benchmark for TCV. The simulations show a qualitative consistency, but the quantitative differences remain, which are assessed herein. It is found that, for a given separatrix density, the simulations most notably yield a colder, and denser, divertor state with a higher divertor neutral pressure than measured.

Original languageEnglish
Article number082508
JournalPhysics of Plasmas
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training program 2014–2018 and 2019–2020 under the Grant Agreement No. 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. This work was supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under the Award No. DESC0010529.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Author(s).


Dive into the research topics of 'SOLPS-ITER validation with TCV L-mode discharges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this