SOA and EDA: a comparative study: similarities, differences and conceptual guidelines on their usage

Zaharah Bukhsh, Marten van Sinderen, Prince M. Singh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICETE 2015 :proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications : Colmar, Alsace, France, 20-22 July, 2015
EditorsM.S. Obaidat
Place of PublicationPiscataway
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)978-9-8975-8140-3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event12th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2015) - Colmar, France
Duration: 20 Jul 201522 Jul 2015

Conference

Conference12th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2015)
Abbreviated titleICETE 2015
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityColmar
Period20/07/1522/07/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SOA and EDA: a comparative study: similarities, differences and conceptual guidelines on their usage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this