Skeletal muscle involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 2. A comparative muscle ultrasound study

  • A A Tieleman
  • , N van Alfen
  • , J.P. van Dijk
  • , S. Pillen
  • , B G M van Engelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study determines the presence and extent of muscle changes in 31 myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) patients detected by muscle ultrasound. Results were compared to 31 adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients (DM1) and healthy controls. Furthermore, we tested the hypothesis that structural muscle changes correlate with age, quantitative muscle force and serum creatine kinase in both disorders. In DM2 all seven examined muscles (right masseter muscle, right and left biceps brachii, right and left forearm flexors, right rectus femoris, and left tibialis anterior muscle) showed increased mean echo intensities (p ≤ 0.001). Atrophy of the masseter muscle and rectus femoris were both found in 23% of DM2 patients. Muscle thickness was significantly more decreased in the elbow flexors in DM2 compared to DM1. Echo intensity sum score correlated positively with age in DM2 (r=0.57, p=0.001) and negatively with muscle force (r=0.36, p=0.048). We conclude that all tested muscles are affected and structurally abnormal in DM2 patients. Proximal arm muscles are more affected in DM2 compared to DM1, which corresponds to clinical findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-499
Number of pages8
JournalNeuromuscular Disorders
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Atrophy/diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Strength/physiology
  • Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging
  • Myotonic Disorders/diagnostic imaging
  • Myotonic Dystrophy/diagnostic imaging
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Skeletal muscle involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 2. A comparative muscle ultrasound study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this