Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

364 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Business process modeling is heavily applied in practice, but important quality issues have not been addressed thoroughly by research. A notorious problem is the low level of modeling competence that many casual modelers in process documentation projects have. Existing approaches towards model quality might be of potential benefit, but they suffer from at least one of the following problems. On the one hand, frameworks like SEQUAL and the Guidelines of Modeling are either too abstract to be applicable for novices and non-experts in practice. On the other hand, there are collections of pragmatic hints that lack a sound research foundation. In this paper, we analyze existing research on relationships between model structure on the one hand and error probability and understanding on the other hand. As a synthesis we propose a set of seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Each of these guidelines builds on strong empirical insights, yet they are formulated to be intuitive to practitioners. Furthermore, we analyze how the guidelines are prioritized by industry experts. In this regard, the seven guidelines have the potential to serve as an important tool of knowledge transfer from academia into modeling practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages127-136
JournalInformation and Software Technology
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Model structures
Industry
Acoustic waves
Error probability

Cite this

@article{1e0bf35a69324848a0d659819b63a438,
title = "Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG)",
abstract = "Business process modeling is heavily applied in practice, but important quality issues have not been addressed thoroughly by research. A notorious problem is the low level of modeling competence that many casual modelers in process documentation projects have. Existing approaches towards model quality might be of potential benefit, but they suffer from at least one of the following problems. On the one hand, frameworks like SEQUAL and the Guidelines of Modeling are either too abstract to be applicable for novices and non-experts in practice. On the other hand, there are collections of pragmatic hints that lack a sound research foundation. In this paper, we analyze existing research on relationships between model structure on the one hand and error probability and understanding on the other hand. As a synthesis we propose a set of seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Each of these guidelines builds on strong empirical insights, yet they are formulated to be intuitive to practitioners. Furthermore, we analyze how the guidelines are prioritized by industry experts. In this regard, the seven guidelines have the potential to serve as an important tool of knowledge transfer from academia into modeling practice.",
author = "J. Mendling and H.A. Reijers and {Aalst, van der}, W.M.P.",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Information and Software Technology",
issn = "0950-5849",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). / Mendling, J.; Reijers, H.A.; Aalst, van der, W.M.P.

In: Information and Software Technology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2010, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG)

AU - Mendling,J.

AU - Reijers,H.A.

AU - Aalst, van der,W.M.P.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Business process modeling is heavily applied in practice, but important quality issues have not been addressed thoroughly by research. A notorious problem is the low level of modeling competence that many casual modelers in process documentation projects have. Existing approaches towards model quality might be of potential benefit, but they suffer from at least one of the following problems. On the one hand, frameworks like SEQUAL and the Guidelines of Modeling are either too abstract to be applicable for novices and non-experts in practice. On the other hand, there are collections of pragmatic hints that lack a sound research foundation. In this paper, we analyze existing research on relationships between model structure on the one hand and error probability and understanding on the other hand. As a synthesis we propose a set of seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Each of these guidelines builds on strong empirical insights, yet they are formulated to be intuitive to practitioners. Furthermore, we analyze how the guidelines are prioritized by industry experts. In this regard, the seven guidelines have the potential to serve as an important tool of knowledge transfer from academia into modeling practice.

AB - Business process modeling is heavily applied in practice, but important quality issues have not been addressed thoroughly by research. A notorious problem is the low level of modeling competence that many casual modelers in process documentation projects have. Existing approaches towards model quality might be of potential benefit, but they suffer from at least one of the following problems. On the one hand, frameworks like SEQUAL and the Guidelines of Modeling are either too abstract to be applicable for novices and non-experts in practice. On the other hand, there are collections of pragmatic hints that lack a sound research foundation. In this paper, we analyze existing research on relationships between model structure on the one hand and error probability and understanding on the other hand. As a synthesis we propose a set of seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Each of these guidelines builds on strong empirical insights, yet they are formulated to be intuitive to practitioners. Furthermore, we analyze how the guidelines are prioritized by industry experts. In this regard, the seven guidelines have the potential to serve as an important tool of knowledge transfer from academia into modeling practice.

U2 - 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.004

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Information and Software Technology

T2 - Information and Software Technology

JF - Information and Software Technology

SN - 0950-5849

IS - 2

ER -