Selection criteria for building performance simulation tools : contrasting architects' and engineers' needs

S.G. Attia, J.L.M. Hensen, L. Beltran, A. De Herde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

108 Citations (Scopus)
265 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article summarises a study undertaken to reveal potential challenges and opportunities for using building performance simulation (BPS) tools. The article reviews current trends in building simulation and outlines major criteria for BPS tool selection and evaluation based on analysing users' needs for tools capabilities and requirement specifications. The research is carried out by means of a literature review and two online surveys. The findings are based on an inter-group comparison between architects and engineers. The aim is to rank BPS tool selection criteria and compare 10 state-of-the-art BPS tools in the USA market. Five criteria are composed to stack up against theories and practices of BPS. Based on the experience gained during the survey, suggested criteria are critically reviewed and tested. The final results indicate a wide gap between architects' and engineers' priorities and tool ranking. This gap is discussed and suggestions for improvement of current tools are presented.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-169
JournalJournal of Building Performance Simulation
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection criteria for building performance simulation tools : contrasting architects' and engineers' needs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this