Science versus design : comparable, contrastive or conducive?

G.J. Verkerke, E.B. Houwen, van der, A.A. Broekhuis, J. Bursa, G. Catapano, P. McCullagh, K. Mottaghy, P. Niederer, R. Reilly, V. Rogalewicz, P. Segers, N.J.J. Verdonschot

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Science and design are two completely separated areas of expertise with their own specialists. Science analyses the existing world to create new knowledge, design uses existing knowledge to create a new world. This tunnel-vision mentality and narrow-minded approach is dangerous for problem solving, where a broad view on potential solutions is required to realise a high-quality answer on the defined problem. We state that design benefits from scientific methods, resulting in a more effective design process and in better products, while science benefits from a design approach, resulting in more efficient and effective results. Our philosophy is illustrated using examples from the field of biomedical engineering. Both methods can benefit tremendously from each other. By applying scientific methods, superior choices will be made in the design process. With design, more accurate, effective and efficient science will be performed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-201
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    Volume21
    Issue numbermay 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Science versus design : comparable, contrastive or conducive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this