Role of ZnO and CeOx in Cu-Based model catalysts in activation of h2O and CO2 dynamics studied by in situ ultraviolet−Visible and x‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Yibin Bu, C.J. Weststrate, J.W. Niemantsverdriet, Hans O.A. Fredriksson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flat model and powder Cu, ZnO/Cu, and CeOx/Cu catalysts were studied by focusing on the role of the oxide phase as a promoter in the water gas shift (WGS) and its reverse reaction (RWGS). Activity measurements of the powder catalysts showed that both oxides enhance Cu reactivity, with CeOx/Cu being more active than ZnO/Cu in the WGS reaction. In situ ultraviolet−visible spectroscopy, exploiting the localized surface plasmon resonances of metallic Cu nanoparticles, together with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was then used to elucidate the origin of the enhanced reactivity on flat model catalysts. These experiments showed that ZnO and CeOx promote H2O and CO2 dissociation, leading to oxidation of the Cu nanoparticles. CeOx performs better in this respect than ZnO. This is important because the reactivity in the WGS and RWGS reactions is related to the ability to activate H2O and CO2. The Ce3+ ions are identified as the most efficient sites for H2O and CO2 dissociation, while Cu0 keeps Ce3+ stable by promoting reduction of Ce4+ during the dissociation process. In this sense, the CeOx/Cu catalyst forms a bifunctional catalyst, which is more active in the (R)WGS than CeOx and Cu catalysts separately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7994-8003
JournalACS Catalysis
Volume6
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Activation of H2O
  • Bifunctional catalyst
  • Ceria
  • CO2
  • Cu-based model catalyst
  • In situ UV−vis
  • RWGS
  • WGS
  • XPS

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Role of ZnO and CeO<sub>x</sub> in Cu-Based model catalysts in activation of h<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> dynamics studied by in situ ultraviolet−Visible and x‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this