Robust! : handle with care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Michael Weisberg has argued that robustness analysis is useful in evaluating both scientific models and their implications and that robustness analysis comes in three types that share their form and aim. We argue for three cautionary claims regarding Weisberg’s reconstruction: (1) robustness analysis may be of limited or no value in evaluating models and their implications; (2) the unificatory reconstruction conceals that the three types of robustness differ in form and role; (3) there is no confluence of types of robustness. We illustrate our central first claim with a case study: the application of Lotka-Volterra models to technology diffusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-364
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Robust! : handle with care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this