Risk and trust

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Philosophical conceptions of the relationship between risk and trust may be divided into three main families. The first conception, taking its cue from Hobbes, sees trust as a kind of risk assessment involving the expected behavior of another person, for the sake of achieving the likely benefits of cooperation. The second conception of trust sees it as an alternative to calculative risk assessment, in which instead of calculating the risks of relying on another person, one willingly relies on them for other reasons, e.g., habitual, social, or moral reasons. The third conception sees trust as a morally loaded attitude, in which one has a moral expectation that one takes it to be the responsibility of the trusted person to fulfill. In the context of interpersonal relationships this attributed moral responsibility creates spheres perceived to be free of interpersonal risk, in which one can pursue cooperative aims. In this chapter, we examine how these three views account for two prima facie relationships between risk and trust, and we look at some empirical research on risk and trust that employs these different conceptions of what trust is. We then suggest some future areas of philosophical research on the relationship between trust and risk.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk
EditorsS. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, M. Peterson
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer
Pages857-876
Number of pages1187
ISBN (Print)978-9400714342
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

risk assessment
human being
responsibility
empirical research

Cite this

Nickel, P. J., & Vaesen, K. (2012). Risk and trust. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk (pp. 857-876). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34
Nickel, P.J. ; Vaesen, K./ Risk and trust. Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk. editor / S. Roeser ; R. Hillerbrand ; P. Sandin ; M. Peterson. Berlin : Springer, 2012. pp. 857-876
@inbook{b68e20528c3d45048fef3fc8a13abcb9,
title = "Risk and trust",
abstract = "Philosophical conceptions of the relationship between risk and trust may be divided into three main families. The first conception, taking its cue from Hobbes, sees trust as a kind of risk assessment involving the expected behavior of another person, for the sake of achieving the likely benefits of cooperation. The second conception of trust sees it as an alternative to calculative risk assessment, in which instead of calculating the risks of relying on another person, one willingly relies on them for other reasons, e.g., habitual, social, or moral reasons. The third conception sees trust as a morally loaded attitude, in which one has a moral expectation that one takes it to be the responsibility of the trusted person to fulfill. In the context of interpersonal relationships this attributed moral responsibility creates spheres perceived to be free of interpersonal risk, in which one can pursue cooperative aims. In this chapter, we examine how these three views account for two prima facie relationships between risk and trust, and we look at some empirical research on risk and trust that employs these different conceptions of what trust is. We then suggest some future areas of philosophical research on the relationship between trust and risk.",
author = "P.J. Nickel and K. Vaesen",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-9400714342",
pages = "857--876",
editor = "S. Roeser and R. Hillerbrand and P. Sandin and M. Peterson",
booktitle = "Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Germany",

}

Nickel, PJ & Vaesen, K 2012, Risk and trust. in S Roeser, R Hillerbrand, P Sandin & M Peterson (eds), Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk. Springer, Berlin, pp. 857-876. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34

Risk and trust. / Nickel, P.J.; Vaesen, K.

Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk. ed. / S. Roeser; R. Hillerbrand; P. Sandin; M. Peterson. Berlin : Springer, 2012. p. 857-876.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

TY - CHAP

T1 - Risk and trust

AU - Nickel,P.J.

AU - Vaesen,K.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Philosophical conceptions of the relationship between risk and trust may be divided into three main families. The first conception, taking its cue from Hobbes, sees trust as a kind of risk assessment involving the expected behavior of another person, for the sake of achieving the likely benefits of cooperation. The second conception of trust sees it as an alternative to calculative risk assessment, in which instead of calculating the risks of relying on another person, one willingly relies on them for other reasons, e.g., habitual, social, or moral reasons. The third conception sees trust as a morally loaded attitude, in which one has a moral expectation that one takes it to be the responsibility of the trusted person to fulfill. In the context of interpersonal relationships this attributed moral responsibility creates spheres perceived to be free of interpersonal risk, in which one can pursue cooperative aims. In this chapter, we examine how these three views account for two prima facie relationships between risk and trust, and we look at some empirical research on risk and trust that employs these different conceptions of what trust is. We then suggest some future areas of philosophical research on the relationship between trust and risk.

AB - Philosophical conceptions of the relationship between risk and trust may be divided into three main families. The first conception, taking its cue from Hobbes, sees trust as a kind of risk assessment involving the expected behavior of another person, for the sake of achieving the likely benefits of cooperation. The second conception of trust sees it as an alternative to calculative risk assessment, in which instead of calculating the risks of relying on another person, one willingly relies on them for other reasons, e.g., habitual, social, or moral reasons. The third conception sees trust as a morally loaded attitude, in which one has a moral expectation that one takes it to be the responsibility of the trusted person to fulfill. In the context of interpersonal relationships this attributed moral responsibility creates spheres perceived to be free of interpersonal risk, in which one can pursue cooperative aims. In this chapter, we examine how these three views account for two prima facie relationships between risk and trust, and we look at some empirical research on risk and trust that employs these different conceptions of what trust is. We then suggest some future areas of philosophical research on the relationship between trust and risk.

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-9400714342

SP - 857

EP - 876

BT - Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -

Nickel PJ, Vaesen K. Risk and trust. In Roeser S, Hillerbrand R, Sandin P, Peterson M, editors, Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk. Berlin: Springer. 2012. p. 857-876. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34