Response to "comment on Comparison between solutions of the general dynamic equation and the kinetic equation for nucleation and droplet growth' " [J. Chem. Phys. 132, 047101 (2010)]

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The analytical results presented in the comment of Shneidman for the droplet size distribution, the thickness of the distribution front, and the location of the stationary source are compared to our earlier numerical results. The agreement is very good in the case of the size distribution and the source location, but the analytical result for the thickness of the front deviates from the numerical result at high supersaturations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number047102
JournalJournal of Chemical Physics
Volume132
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to "comment on Comparison between solutions of the general dynamic equation and the kinetic equation for nucleation and droplet growth' " [J. Chem. Phys. 132, 047101 (2010)]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this