TY - JOUR
T1 - Resilient passive cooling strategies during heat waves
T2 - A quantitative assessment in different climates
AU - Sengupta, Abantika
AU - An, Peihang
AU - Breesch, Hilde
AU - Afshari, Afshin
AU - Amaripadath, Deepak
AU - Attia, Shady
AU - Baba, Fuad
AU - Corrado, Vincenzo
AU - Eli, Letícia
AU - Krelling, Amanda F.
AU - Lee, Sang Hoon
AU - Levinson, Ronnen
AU - Olinger, Marcelo
AU - P․Tootkaboni, Mamak
AU - Wang, Liangzhu (Leon)
AU - Zhang, Chen
AU - Zinzi, Michele
A2 - Al-Assaad, Douaa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/4/15
Y1 - 2025/4/15
N2 - The frequency and severity of extreme weather events like heat waves are rising, posing significant challenges for buildings and their cooling systems. To safeguard occupants from potentially hazardous indoor temperatures, buildings and their cooling systems must be designed and managed to withstand these conditions and thus be resilient. This study assessed via building simulations the resilience performance of selected individual passive cooling strategies for five different climates (ASHRAE climate zones 2A, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 6A) and three heatwave periods (historical, future mid-term and future long-term). Resilience performance was assessed with three criteria: heatwave impact (°C·h above a reference standard effective temperature), absorptivity rate (°C/h), and recovery rate (°C/h). Strategies such as solar shading, cool envelope materials, advanced glazing, and ventilative cooling could each reduce the heat wave impact and the absorptivity rates in all studied climates at different levels of efficiency. As the heat waves became more extreme, the performance declined at different rates depending on the climate. Some strategies were more suited to specific climates such as cool envelope materials in climate 2A. Most strategies could not speed up the recovery rates from the heat waves except for ventilative cooling in climate 3B. With careful design to maximize the benefits of favorable wind conditions, every climate could benefit from ventilative cooling strategies to speed up recovery from heat waves.
AB - The frequency and severity of extreme weather events like heat waves are rising, posing significant challenges for buildings and their cooling systems. To safeguard occupants from potentially hazardous indoor temperatures, buildings and their cooling systems must be designed and managed to withstand these conditions and thus be resilient. This study assessed via building simulations the resilience performance of selected individual passive cooling strategies for five different climates (ASHRAE climate zones 2A, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 6A) and three heatwave periods (historical, future mid-term and future long-term). Resilience performance was assessed with three criteria: heatwave impact (°C·h above a reference standard effective temperature), absorptivity rate (°C/h), and recovery rate (°C/h). Strategies such as solar shading, cool envelope materials, advanced glazing, and ventilative cooling could each reduce the heat wave impact and the absorptivity rates in all studied climates at different levels of efficiency. As the heat waves became more extreme, the performance declined at different rates depending on the climate. Some strategies were more suited to specific climates such as cool envelope materials in climate 2A. Most strategies could not speed up the recovery rates from the heat waves except for ventilative cooling in climate 3B. With careful design to maximize the benefits of favorable wind conditions, every climate could benefit from ventilative cooling strategies to speed up recovery from heat waves.
KW - Degree of shock
KW - Heat waves
KW - Passive cooling
KW - Quantitative assessment
KW - Thermal resilience
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85218639558
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112698
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112698
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218639558
SN - 0360-1323
VL - 274
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
M1 - 112698
ER -