Research methods for the design of smart environments: a comparison between two types of buildings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to evaluate different design and research methods for their applicability to the design of smart environments. It focuses on methods that are able to capture human emotions, feelings and interaction with their environments. The article will focus on a comparison of different design methods in the light of smart buildings and will further explore these comparisons by using two types of buildings (housing for older
adults and schools).
Design/methodology/approach – This article is a literature study on design methods, comparing literature on different types of design (such as user-centred design or codesign). Afterwards these insights are applied to two types of buildings, specifically smart housing for older adults and smart schools.
Originality/value – This research shows the importance of designing with empathy in the design and research into smart buildings. Furthermore, it examines different design methods for different stages of the design. Lastly, it applies these Methodological insights to two building types.
Practical implications – For designing of and research on smart environments it is important that designers and researchers develop a sense of empathy for the users. It helps to give a more complete view of the user in terms of how they make sense of their environment and the interaction with their environment. This article contributes specifically to how this can be applied in the case of smart schools and smart buildings for older adults.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocietal Impact of Knowledge and Design 
Subtitle of host publication13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics
Place of PublicationDelft
Pages1122-1136
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)978-88-96687-11-6
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2018
Event2018 International Forum on knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD 2018) - Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Duration: 4 Jul 20186 Jul 2018
Conference number: 13
https://www.ifkad.org

Conference

Conference2018 International Forum on knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD 2018)
Abbreviated titleIFKAD 2018
CountryNetherlands
CityDelft
Period4/07/186/07/18
OtherSocietal Impact of Knowledge and Design
Internet address

Fingerprint

Intelligent buildings
School buildings

Keywords

  • smart environments
  • design methods
  • design methodology
  • older adults
  • schools

Cite this

Hammink, J. H. W., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). Research methods for the design of smart environments: a comparison between two types of buildings. In Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design : 13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics (pp. 1122-1136). Delft.
Hammink, J.H.W. ; Mohammadi, M./ Research methods for the design of smart environments : a comparison between two types of buildings. Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design : 13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics. Delft, 2018. pp. 1122-1136
@inproceedings{b77aeaedd3be42fbb072d4653dfc9b8a,
title = "Research methods for the design of smart environments: a comparison between two types of buildings",
abstract = "Purpose - This research aims to evaluate different design and research methods for their applicability to the design of smart environments. It focuses on methods that are able to capture human emotions, feelings and interaction with their environments. The article will focus on a comparison of different design methods in the light of smart buildings and will further explore these comparisons by using two types of buildings (housing for olderadults and schools).Design/methodology/approach – This article is a literature study on design methods, comparing literature on different types of design (such as user-centred design or codesign). Afterwards these insights are applied to two types of buildings, specifically smart housing for older adults and smart schools.Originality/value – This research shows the importance of designing with empathy in the design and research into smart buildings. Furthermore, it examines different design methods for different stages of the design. Lastly, it applies these Methodological insights to two building types.Practical implications – For designing of and research on smart environments it is important that designers and researchers develop a sense of empathy for the users. It helps to give a more complete view of the user in terms of how they make sense of their environment and the interaction with their environment. This article contributes specifically to how this can be applied in the case of smart schools and smart buildings for older adults.",
keywords = "smart environments, design methods, design methodology, older adults, schools",
author = "J.H.W. Hammink and M. Mohammadi",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "4",
language = "English",
pages = "1122--1136",
booktitle = "Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design ",

}

Hammink, JHW & Mohammadi, M 2018, Research methods for the design of smart environments: a comparison between two types of buildings. in Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design : 13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics. Delft, pp. 1122-1136, 2018 International Forum on knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD 2018), Delft, Netherlands, 4/07/18.

Research methods for the design of smart environments : a comparison between two types of buildings. / Hammink, J.H.W.; Mohammadi, M.

Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design : 13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics. Delft, 2018. p. 1122-1136.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Research methods for the design of smart environments

T2 - a comparison between two types of buildings

AU - Hammink,J.H.W.

AU - Mohammadi,M.

PY - 2018/7/4

Y1 - 2018/7/4

N2 - Purpose - This research aims to evaluate different design and research methods for their applicability to the design of smart environments. It focuses on methods that are able to capture human emotions, feelings and interaction with their environments. The article will focus on a comparison of different design methods in the light of smart buildings and will further explore these comparisons by using two types of buildings (housing for olderadults and schools).Design/methodology/approach – This article is a literature study on design methods, comparing literature on different types of design (such as user-centred design or codesign). Afterwards these insights are applied to two types of buildings, specifically smart housing for older adults and smart schools.Originality/value – This research shows the importance of designing with empathy in the design and research into smart buildings. Furthermore, it examines different design methods for different stages of the design. Lastly, it applies these Methodological insights to two building types.Practical implications – For designing of and research on smart environments it is important that designers and researchers develop a sense of empathy for the users. It helps to give a more complete view of the user in terms of how they make sense of their environment and the interaction with their environment. This article contributes specifically to how this can be applied in the case of smart schools and smart buildings for older adults.

AB - Purpose - This research aims to evaluate different design and research methods for their applicability to the design of smart environments. It focuses on methods that are able to capture human emotions, feelings and interaction with their environments. The article will focus on a comparison of different design methods in the light of smart buildings and will further explore these comparisons by using two types of buildings (housing for olderadults and schools).Design/methodology/approach – This article is a literature study on design methods, comparing literature on different types of design (such as user-centred design or codesign). Afterwards these insights are applied to two types of buildings, specifically smart housing for older adults and smart schools.Originality/value – This research shows the importance of designing with empathy in the design and research into smart buildings. Furthermore, it examines different design methods for different stages of the design. Lastly, it applies these Methodological insights to two building types.Practical implications – For designing of and research on smart environments it is important that designers and researchers develop a sense of empathy for the users. It helps to give a more complete view of the user in terms of how they make sense of their environment and the interaction with their environment. This article contributes specifically to how this can be applied in the case of smart schools and smart buildings for older adults.

KW - smart environments

KW - design methods

KW - design methodology

KW - older adults

KW - schools

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1122

EP - 1136

BT - Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design 

CY - Delft

ER -

Hammink JHW, Mohammadi M. Research methods for the design of smart environments: a comparison between two types of buildings. In Societal Impact of Knowledge and Design : 13th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics. Delft. 2018. p. 1122-1136.