Reply to: “Pitfalls in identifying active catalyst species”

Xavier Isidro Pereira-Hernández, Andrew DeLaRiva, Valery Muravev, Deepak Kunwar, Haifeng Xiong, Berlin Sudduth, Mark Engelhard, Libor Kovarik, Emiel J.M. Hensen (Corresponding author), Yong Wang (Corresponding author), Abhaya K. Datye (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Article number4574
Number of pages3
JournalNature Communications
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Sept 2020

Funding

This work was supported by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (SC), Division of Chemical Sciences (grant DE-FG02-05ER15712). X.I.P.-H. thanks Fulbright Colombia and Colciencias for the financial support provided to pursue a Ph.D. Y.W. acknowledges additional support from DOE, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technology Office. E.J.M.H. and V.M. acknowledge support by the Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion (MCEC), an NWO Gravitation program funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the government of the Netherlands, and a Vici grant of the NWO. The XPS (CPA catalysts) and TEM measurements were performed at EMSL, a DOE Office of Science User Facility sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research.

FundersFunder number
Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion
Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

    Cite this