Reply to "Comment on 'Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching'"

C. Storm; P. Nelson

doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902

Reply to "Comment on 'Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching'"

C. Storm
, P. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

260 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In his Comment to an earlier paper [Phys. Rev. E 67, 051906 (2003)] Lam points out an error in Eq. (20) of the original paper. Here we show that use of the corrected expression produces results very similar to those presented in our original paper, so our qualitative conclusions are unchanged.

Original language	English
Article number	013902
Pages (from-to)	1-2
Number of pages	2
Journal	Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
Volume	70
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902
Publication status	Published - 2004

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902

publishers versionFinal published version, 20.2 KB

Cite this

@article{6904367252e14e41aa8ec4c0332c2c84,

title = "Reply to {"}Comment on 'Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching'{"}",

abstract = "In his Comment to an earlier paper [Phys. Rev. E 67, 051906 (2003)] Lam points out an error in Eq. (20) of the original paper. Here we show that use of the corrected expression produces results very similar to those presented in our original paper, so our qualitative conclusions are unchanged.",

author = "C. Storm and P. Nelson",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902",

language = "English",

volume = "70",

pages = "1--2",

journal = "Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics",

issn = "1539-3755",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "Comment on 'Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching'"

AU - Storm, C.

AU - Nelson, P.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In his Comment to an earlier paper [Phys. Rev. E 67, 051906 (2003)] Lam points out an error in Eq. (20) of the original paper. Here we show that use of the corrected expression produces results very similar to those presented in our original paper, so our qualitative conclusions are unchanged.

AB - In his Comment to an earlier paper [Phys. Rev. E 67, 051906 (2003)] Lam points out an error in Eq. (20) of the original paper. Here we show that use of the corrected expression produces results very similar to those presented in our original paper, so our qualitative conclusions are unchanged.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.013902

M3 - Article

C2 - 15324109

SN - 1539-3755

VL - 70

SP - 1

EP - 2

JO - Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

JF - Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

M1 - 013902

ER -

Reply to "Comment on 'Theory of high-force DNA stretching and overstretching'"

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this