Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Removing nitrogen from wastewater with side stream anammox: What are the trade-offs between environmental impacts?

  • Mara Hauck (Corresponding author)
  • , Francisca A. Maalcke-Luesken
  • , Mike S.M. Jetten
  • , Mark A.J. Huijbregts

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) is a novel way to reduce nitrogen in ammonium rich wastewater. Although aquatic eutrophication will certainly be reduced, it is unknown how other environmental impacts may change by including anammox in the treatment of wastewater. Here, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to assess the environmental profile of a full scale wastewater treatment plant over its complete life cycle. Changes in the environmental profile by introducing a two-step anammox system in the side stream were assessed based on monitoring data from the full scale Dokhaven wastewater treatment plant (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Our results confirmed that the two-step anammox technique further reduced life cycle nitrogen emissions compared to the regular treatment of nitrogen in wastewater. This led to a decrease in marine eutrophication potential of 16% for the total wastewater treatment plant. However, our LCA results showed that these ammonium reductions came at the cost of increasing climate change and other environmental impacts. Climate change impacts increased with 9% going from a traditional wastewater plant to the one including two-step anammox, due to increased direct emissions next to electricity use. Our LCA highlights trade-offs when adding two-step anammox for nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment systems. This has significant implications for other WWTPs as these trade-offs should not neglected when implementation of anammox is considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)212-219
Number of pages8
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume107
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This study was supported by erc proof of concept grant lta nitro 297436. MSM Jetten was further supported by erc anammox 232937. M. Hauck was further supported by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment RIVM-project S/607020, Measurably Sustainable within the spearhead Healthy and Sustainable Living Environment, commissioned by the Director-General of RIVM, and run under the auspices of RIVM's Science Advisory Board.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  4. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Anammox
  • Climate change
  • Eutrophication
  • LCA
  • NO emissions
  • Nitrogen removal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Removing nitrogen from wastewater with side stream anammox: What are the trade-offs between environmental impacts?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this