Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods

L.R. Grabowski; E.M. Veldhuizen, van; W.R. Rutgers

Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods

L.R. Grabowski, E.M. Veldhuizen, van, W.R. Rutgers

Elementary Processes in Gas Discharges

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Direct electrical energization methods for removal of persistent substances ITom water are under investigation in the framework oftheytriD-project. The emphasis of the first stage of the project is the energy efficiency. A comparison is made between a batch reactor with a thin layer of water and an aerosol reactor. The method of energization is mainly the application of fast pulses. In case of the batch reactor it is compared with DC. The ozon concentration is determined as an indicator for the efficiency of the chemical reactions, the yieldis 4 g/kWh for the DC batch reactor, 50 g/kWh for the pulsed batch reactor and up to 200 g/kWh for the aerosol reactor. For initial testing phenol degradation is determined. 50% of the initial 0.1 mM is reached in 8 minutes in the pulsed batch reactor. The phenol removal yield is several grams per kWh up to now. Matlab simulations show that the surface-volume ratio is an important parameter for the speed of phenol degradation. This conclusion is also obtained from the experiments.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004
Editors	B.R. Locke
Publisher	Florida A&M University
Pages	114-119
Publication status	Published - 2004
Event	4th International Symposium on Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT-4), May 10-14, 2004, Panama City Beach, FL, USA - Panama City Beach, FL, United States Duration: 10 May 2004 → 14 May 2004

Conference

Conference	4th International Symposium on Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT-4), May 10-14, 2004, Panama City Beach, FL, USA
Abbreviated title	ISNTPT-4
Country/Territory	United States
City	Panama City Beach, FL
Period	10/05/04 → 14/05/04

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

Grabowski, L. R., Veldhuizen, van, E. M., & Rutgers, W. R. (2004). Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods. In B. R. Locke (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004 (pp. 114-119). Florida A&M University.

Grabowski, L.R. ; Veldhuizen, van, E.M. ; Rutgers, W.R. / Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004. editor / B.R. Locke. Florida A&M University, 2004. pp. 114-119

@inproceedings{c06d1ce08c984cda8f2ff68ec2b5c8ba,

title = "Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods",

abstract = "Direct electrical energization methods for removal of persistent substances ITom water are under investigation in the framework oftheytriD-project. The emphasis of the first stage of the project is the energy efficiency. A comparison is made between a batch reactor with a thin layer of water and an aerosol reactor. The method of energization is mainly the application of fast pulses. In case of the batch reactor it is compared with DC. The ozon concentration is determined as an indicator for the efficiency of the chemical reactions, the yieldis 4 g/kWh for the DC batch reactor, 50 g/kWh for the pulsed batch reactor and up to 200 g/kWh for the aerosol reactor. For initial testing phenol degradation is determined. 50% of the initial 0.1 mM is reached in 8 minutes in the pulsed batch reactor. The phenol removal yield is several grams per kWh up to now. Matlab simulations show that the surface-volume ratio is an important parameter for the speed of phenol degradation. This conclusion is also obtained from the experiments.",

author = "L.R. Grabowski and {Veldhuizen, van}, E.M. and W.R. Rutgers",

year = "2004",

language = "English",

pages = "114--119",

editor = "B.R. Locke",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004",

publisher = "Florida A&M University",

note = "4th International Symposium on Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT-4), May 10-14, 2004, Panama City Beach, FL, USA, ISNTPT-4 ; Conference date: 10-05-2004 Through 14-05-2004",

}

Grabowski, LR, Veldhuizen, van, EM & Rutgers, WR 2004, Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods. in BR Locke (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004. Florida A&M University, pp. 114-119, 4th International Symposium on Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT-4), May 10-14, 2004, Panama City Beach, FL, USA, Panama City Beach, FL, United States, 10/05/04.

Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods. / Grabowski, L.R.; Veldhuizen, van, E.M.; Rutgers, W.R.
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004. ed. / B.R. Locke. Florida A&M University, 2004. p. 114-119.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic

TY - GEN

T1 - Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods

AU - Grabowski, L.R.

AU - Veldhuizen, van, E.M.

AU - Rutgers, W.R.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Direct electrical energization methods for removal of persistent substances ITom water are under investigation in the framework oftheytriD-project. The emphasis of the first stage of the project is the energy efficiency. A comparison is made between a batch reactor with a thin layer of water and an aerosol reactor. The method of energization is mainly the application of fast pulses. In case of the batch reactor it is compared with DC. The ozon concentration is determined as an indicator for the efficiency of the chemical reactions, the yieldis 4 g/kWh for the DC batch reactor, 50 g/kWh for the pulsed batch reactor and up to 200 g/kWh for the aerosol reactor. For initial testing phenol degradation is determined. 50% of the initial 0.1 mM is reached in 8 minutes in the pulsed batch reactor. The phenol removal yield is several grams per kWh up to now. Matlab simulations show that the surface-volume ratio is an important parameter for the speed of phenol degradation. This conclusion is also obtained from the experiments.

AB - Direct electrical energization methods for removal of persistent substances ITom water are under investigation in the framework oftheytriD-project. The emphasis of the first stage of the project is the energy efficiency. A comparison is made between a batch reactor with a thin layer of water and an aerosol reactor. The method of energization is mainly the application of fast pulses. In case of the batch reactor it is compared with DC. The ozon concentration is determined as an indicator for the efficiency of the chemical reactions, the yieldis 4 g/kWh for the DC batch reactor, 50 g/kWh for the pulsed batch reactor and up to 200 g/kWh for the aerosol reactor. For initial testing phenol degradation is determined. 50% of the initial 0.1 mM is reached in 8 minutes in the pulsed batch reactor. The phenol removal yield is several grams per kWh up to now. Matlab simulations show that the surface-volume ratio is an important parameter for the speed of phenol degradation. This conclusion is also obtained from the experiments.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 114

EP - 119

BT - Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004

A2 - Locke, B.R.

PB - Florida A&M University

T2 - 4th International Symposium on Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT-4), May 10-14, 2004, Panama City Beach, FL, USA

Y2 - 10 May 2004 through 14 May 2004

ER -

Grabowski LR, Veldhuizen, van EM, Rutgers WR. Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods. In Locke BR, editor, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non Thermal Plasma Technology for Pollution Control and Sustainable Energy Development (ISNTPT 4), Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, May 10 – 14, 2004. Florida A&M University. 2004. p. 114-119

Removal of phenol from water: a comparison of energization methods

Abstract

Conference

UN SDGs

Fingerprint

Cite this