Abstract
In machine learning, the choice of a learning algorithm that is suitable for the application domain is critical. The performance metric used to compare different algorithms must also reflect the concerns of users in the application domain under consideration. In this paper, we propose a novel probability-based performance metric called Relevance Score for evaluating supervised learning algorithms. We evaluate the proposed metric through empirical analysis on a dataset gathered from an intelligent lighting pilot installation. In comparison to the commonly used Classification Accuracy metric, the Relevance Score proves to be more appropriate for a certain class of applications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Machine Learning and Data Mining (9th International Conference, MLDM 2013, New York NY, USA, July 19-25, 2013. Proceedings) |
Editors | P. Perner |
Place of Publication | Berlin |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 195-208 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-642-39711-0 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | 9th International Conmference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2013) - New York, United States Duration: 19 Jun 2013 → 25 Jun 2013 Conference number: 9 |
Publication series
Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
---|---|
Volume | 7988 |
ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
Conference
Conference | 9th International Conmference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2013) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | MLDM 2013 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | New York |
Period | 19/06/13 → 25/06/13 |