Refining Our Understanding of the Flow Through Coronary Artery Branches; Revisiting Murray's Law in Human Epicardial Coronary Arteries

Daniel J. Taylor, Jeroen Feher, Ian Halliday, D. Rodney Hose, Rebecca Gosling, Louise Aubiniere-Robb, Marcel van 't Veer, Danielle Keulards, Pim Tonino, Michel Rochette, Julian Gunn, Paul D. Morris (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Quantification of coronary blood flow is used to evaluate coronary artery disease, but our understanding of flow through branched systems is poor. Murray's law defines coronary morphometric scaling, the relationship between flow (Q) and vessel diameter (D) and is the basis for minimum lumen area targets when intervening on bifurcation lesions. Murray's original law (Q α DP) dictates that the exponent (P) is 3.0, whilst constant blood velocity throughout the system would suggest an exponent of 2.0. In human coronary arteries, the value of Murray's exponent remains unknown. Aim: To establish the exponent in Murray's power law relationship that best reproduces coronary blood flows (Q) and microvascular resistances (Rmicro) in a bifurcating coronary tree. Methods and Results: We screened 48 cases, and were able to evaluate inlet Q and Rmicro in 27 branched coronary arteries, taken from 20 patients, using a novel computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model which reconstructs 3D coronary anatomy from angiography and uses pressure-wire measurements to compute Q and Rmicro distribution in the main- and side-branches. Outputs were validated against invasive measurements using a Rayflow™ catheter. A Murray's power law exponent of 2.15 produced the strongest correlation and closest agreement with inlet Q (zero bias, r = 0.47, p = 0.006) and an exponent of 2.38 produced the strongest correlation and closest agreement with Rmicro (zero bias, r = 0.66, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: The optimal power law exponents for Q and Rmicro were not 3.0, as dictated by Murray's Law, but 2.15 and 2.38 respectively. These data will be useful in assessing patient-specific coronary physiology and tailoring revascularisation decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number871912
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Physiology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2022

Funding

PM was funded by the Wellcome Trust (214567/Z/18/Z). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. RG (NIHR clinical lecturer) is funded by Health Education England (HEE)/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Care.

FundersFunder number
Nottingham University Hospitals
Wellcome Trust214567/Z/18/Z
National Institute for Health and Care Research

    Keywords

    • bifurcation
    • left main coronary artery
    • Murray’s exponent
    • stable angina
    • translational physiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Refining Our Understanding of the Flow Through Coronary Artery Branches; Revisiting Murray's Law in Human Epicardial Coronary Arteries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this