Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: the Venestent study

  • Clara E.E. Hanekamp
  • , Jacques J. Koolen
  • , Peter Den Heijer
  • , Martin J. Schalij
  • , Jan J. Piek
  • , Frits W.H.M. Bär
  • , Iwan De Scheerder
  • , Hans J.R.M. Bonnier
  • , Nico H.J. Pijls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1% in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31. 4% vs. 14.5% (P < 0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P < 0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-457
Number of pages6
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2003

Keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Restenosis
  • Stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: the Venestent study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this