Abstract
Four different methods of question presentation, in interactive computeraided
learning of Dutch-English word pairs are evaluated experimentally. These
methods are: 1) the 'open-question method', 2) the 'multiple-choice method',
3) the 'sequential method' and 4) the 'true/ false method'. When consistently
applied over a learning session, the true/false method provided the highest
learning rate.
In the true/ false method, questions consist of the relevant (Dutch) stimulus
word together with a possibly correct (English) t.ranslation. The student indicates
whether the displayed combination is ' true' or 'false' . For reinforcement,
the correct combination is thereupon displayed. The question selection strategy
depended in all four cases on the student's response history.
The learning rate obtained for the true/false method was found to be almost
the same as that resulting from the traditional way of noninteractive vocabulary
learning, that is the 'paper-and-pencil ' method. Students preferred the
true/ false method to the paper· and-pencil method because of its vividness and
administrative support. It is suggested that, for optimal results, the applied
presentation method should also vary, depending on the student's mastery of
the word pairs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-84 |
Journal | IPO Annual Progress Report |
Volume | 23 |
Publication status | Published - 1988 |