Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.

Gunter Bombaerts, Karolina Doulougeri, Nienke Nieveen

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

Abstract

Ethics education is part of many engineering curricula and at the same time a debated matter in terms of its goals, extent and educational approach. The quality of ethics education is, however, not prominently described in engineering education research (EER). To answer this gap, we perform a literature review that focuses on ethics education in EER. We analysed the data using a general quality framework that considers four elements of quality, i.e. relevance, consistency, practicality and effectiveness. We find that EER elaborates on the relevance of ethics education in three different ways: realisation of conceptual goals as honesty, integrity, or social
responsibility; support of engineering concepts as complexity or risk; or instrumentally to comply with national educational standards. EER has little focus on consistency, except for the link with the entire curriculum. Also practicality is little developed, only on whether assessment is valid and reliable in ethics education. Teachers' perceptions of the instrumentality (is it helpful in teaching), congruence (does it fit the circumstances) and cost (is it feasible with the available time and resources) are less stressed. Debates on effectiveness in turn are prominent in ethics education and focus on the influence of: student characteristics and competences; course design; connection with the curriculum; and broader cultural aspects. We conclude
that consistency and practicality are largely missing in ethics education in EER and that many implicit notions of relevance and effectiveness exist. This framework can make quality more explicit and impact the discussions on ethics education in EER.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1424-1436
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventSEFI 47th Annual Conference - Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), Budapest, Hungary
Duration: 16 Sep 201920 Sep 2019
https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SEFI2019_Proceedings.pdf (link to proceedings)

Conference

ConferenceSEFI 47th Annual Conference
CountryHungary
CityBudapest
Period16/09/1920/09/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

typology
moral philosophy
engineering
curriculum
education
integrity

Cite this

Bombaerts, G., Doulougeri, K., & Nieveen, N. (2019). Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.. 1424-1436. Paper presented at SEFI 47th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Bombaerts, Gunter ; Doulougeri, Karolina ; Nieveen, Nienke. / Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology. Paper presented at SEFI 47th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary.13 p.
@conference{466621d9ee4341bd9e3e5c4dd1b9aaef,
title = "Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.",
abstract = "Ethics education is part of many engineering curricula and at the same time a debated matter in terms of its goals, extent and educational approach. The quality of ethics education is, however, not prominently described in engineering education research (EER). To answer this gap, we perform a literature review that focuses on ethics education in EER. We analysed the data using a general quality framework that considers four elements of quality, i.e. relevance, consistency, practicality and effectiveness. We find that EER elaborates on the relevance of ethics education in three different ways: realisation of conceptual goals as honesty, integrity, or socialresponsibility; support of engineering concepts as complexity or risk; or instrumentally to comply with national educational standards. EER has little focus on consistency, except for the link with the entire curriculum. Also practicality is little developed, only on whether assessment is valid and reliable in ethics education. Teachers' perceptions of the instrumentality (is it helpful in teaching), congruence (does it fit the circumstances) and cost (is it feasible with the available time and resources) are less stressed. Debates on effectiveness in turn are prominent in ethics education and focus on the influence of: student characteristics and competences; course design; connection with the curriculum; and broader cultural aspects. We conclude that consistency and practicality are largely missing in ethics education in EER and that many implicit notions of relevance and effectiveness exist. This framework can make quality more explicit and impact the discussions on ethics education in EER.",
author = "Gunter Bombaerts and Karolina Doulougeri and Nienke Nieveen",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
pages = "1424--1436",
note = "null ; Conference date: 16-09-2019 Through 20-09-2019",
url = "https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SEFI2019_Proceedings.pdf",

}

Bombaerts, G, Doulougeri, K & Nieveen, N 2019, 'Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.', Paper presented at SEFI 47th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 16/09/19 - 20/09/19 pp. 1424-1436.

Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology. / Bombaerts, Gunter; Doulougeri, Karolina; Nieveen, Nienke.

2019. 1424-1436 Paper presented at SEFI 47th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

TY - CONF

T1 - Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.

AU - Bombaerts, Gunter

AU - Doulougeri, Karolina

AU - Nieveen, Nienke

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Ethics education is part of many engineering curricula and at the same time a debated matter in terms of its goals, extent and educational approach. The quality of ethics education is, however, not prominently described in engineering education research (EER). To answer this gap, we perform a literature review that focuses on ethics education in EER. We analysed the data using a general quality framework that considers four elements of quality, i.e. relevance, consistency, practicality and effectiveness. We find that EER elaborates on the relevance of ethics education in three different ways: realisation of conceptual goals as honesty, integrity, or socialresponsibility; support of engineering concepts as complexity or risk; or instrumentally to comply with national educational standards. EER has little focus on consistency, except for the link with the entire curriculum. Also practicality is little developed, only on whether assessment is valid and reliable in ethics education. Teachers' perceptions of the instrumentality (is it helpful in teaching), congruence (does it fit the circumstances) and cost (is it feasible with the available time and resources) are less stressed. Debates on effectiveness in turn are prominent in ethics education and focus on the influence of: student characteristics and competences; course design; connection with the curriculum; and broader cultural aspects. We conclude that consistency and practicality are largely missing in ethics education in EER and that many implicit notions of relevance and effectiveness exist. This framework can make quality more explicit and impact the discussions on ethics education in EER.

AB - Ethics education is part of many engineering curricula and at the same time a debated matter in terms of its goals, extent and educational approach. The quality of ethics education is, however, not prominently described in engineering education research (EER). To answer this gap, we perform a literature review that focuses on ethics education in EER. We analysed the data using a general quality framework that considers four elements of quality, i.e. relevance, consistency, practicality and effectiveness. We find that EER elaborates on the relevance of ethics education in three different ways: realisation of conceptual goals as honesty, integrity, or socialresponsibility; support of engineering concepts as complexity or risk; or instrumentally to comply with national educational standards. EER has little focus on consistency, except for the link with the entire curriculum. Also practicality is little developed, only on whether assessment is valid and reliable in ethics education. Teachers' perceptions of the instrumentality (is it helpful in teaching), congruence (does it fit the circumstances) and cost (is it feasible with the available time and resources) are less stressed. Debates on effectiveness in turn are prominent in ethics education and focus on the influence of: student characteristics and competences; course design; connection with the curriculum; and broader cultural aspects. We conclude that consistency and practicality are largely missing in ethics education in EER and that many implicit notions of relevance and effectiveness exist. This framework can make quality more explicit and impact the discussions on ethics education in EER.

UR - https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SEFI2019_Proceedings.pdf

M3 - Paper

SP - 1424

EP - 1436

ER -

Bombaerts G, Doulougeri K, Nieveen N. Quality of ethics education in engineering programs using Goodlad’s curriculum typology.. 2019. Paper presented at SEFI 47th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary.