Abstract
In recent years, many new methods have been proposed for extracting curve skeletons of 3D shapes, using a mesh-contraction principle. However, it is still unclear how these methods perform with respect to each other, and with respect to earlier voxel-based skeletonization methods, from the viewpoint of certain quality criteria known from the literature. In this study, we compare six recent contraction-based curve-skeletonization methods that use a mesh representation against six accepted quality criteria, on a set of complex 3D shapes. Our results reveal previously unknown limitations of the compared methods, and link these limitations to algorithmic aspects of the studied methods.
Keywords: Curve skeletons; shape analysis; shape representation
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Signal and Image Processing (11th International Symposium, ISMM 2013, Uppsala, Sweden, May 27-29, 2013. Proceedings) |
| Editors | C.L. Luengo Hendriks, G. Borgefors, R. Strand |
| Place of Publication | Berlin |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 425-439 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-642-38293-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Event | 11th International Symposium on Mathematical Morphology; (ISMM 2013), May 27-29, 2013, Uppsala, Sweden - Uppsala, Sweden Duration: 27 May 2013 → 29 May 2013 http://ismm.cb.uu.se/ |
Publication series
| Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
|---|---|
| Volume | 7883 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
Conference
| Conference | 11th International Symposium on Mathematical Morphology; (ISMM 2013), May 27-29, 2013, Uppsala, Sweden |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ISMM 2013 |
| Country | Sweden |
| City | Uppsala |
| Period | 27/05/13 → 29/05/13 |
| Internet address |