TY - JOUR
T1 - Perpendicular ultrasound velocity measurement by 2D cross-correlation of RF data: part B. Volume flow estimation in curved vessels
AU - Beulen, Bart
AU - Verkaik, A.C.
AU - Bijnens, N.
AU - Rutten, M.C.M.
AU - Vosse, van de, F.N.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - A novel axial velocity profile integration method, obtained from ultrasonic perpendicular velocimetry, for flow estimation in curved tubes was validated. In an experimental set-up, physiologically relevant curved geometries and flows were considered. Axial velocity profile measurements were taken by applying particle imaging velocimetry-based methods to ultrasound data acquired by means of a linear array transducer positioned perpendicular to the axial velocity component. Comparison of the assessed asymmetric velocity profiles to computational fluid dynamics calculations showed excellent agreement. Subsequently, the recently introduced cos ¿-integration method for flow estimation was compared to the presently applied Poiseuille and Womersley models. The average deviation between the cos ¿-integration-based unsteady flow estimate and the reference flow was about 5%, compared to an average deviation of 20% for both the Poiseuille and Womersley approximation. Additionally, the effect of off-centre measurement was analysed for the three models. It was found that only for the cos ¿-integration method, an accurate flow estimation is feasible, even when it is measured off centre.
AB - A novel axial velocity profile integration method, obtained from ultrasonic perpendicular velocimetry, for flow estimation in curved tubes was validated. In an experimental set-up, physiologically relevant curved geometries and flows were considered. Axial velocity profile measurements were taken by applying particle imaging velocimetry-based methods to ultrasound data acquired by means of a linear array transducer positioned perpendicular to the axial velocity component. Comparison of the assessed asymmetric velocity profiles to computational fluid dynamics calculations showed excellent agreement. Subsequently, the recently introduced cos ¿-integration method for flow estimation was compared to the presently applied Poiseuille and Womersley models. The average deviation between the cos ¿-integration-based unsteady flow estimate and the reference flow was about 5%, compared to an average deviation of 20% for both the Poiseuille and Womersley approximation. Additionally, the effect of off-centre measurement was analysed for the three models. It was found that only for the cos ¿-integration method, an accurate flow estimation is feasible, even when it is measured off centre.
U2 - 10.1007/s00348-010-0866-4
DO - 10.1007/s00348-010-0866-4
M3 - Article
SN - 0723-4864
VL - 49
SP - 1219
EP - 1229
JO - Experiments in Fluids
JF - Experiments in Fluids
IS - 6
ER -