TY - JOUR
T1 - PEM gensets using membrane reactors technologies
T2 - An economic comparison among different e-fuels
AU - Richard, Simon
AU - Ramirez Santos, Alvaro
AU - Gallucci, Fausto
PY - 2024/1/2
Y1 - 2024/1/2
N2 - The aim of this work is to compare, from an economic viewpoint, the performance of small-scale PEM fuel cell gensets (based on 3 Nedstack™ stacks in series, representing a maximum gross power of 40kWe) that integrate a membrane reactor for three different e-fuels: methanol, ammonia, and methane. To achieve this objective, computer-aided process simulation is deployed to optimize the operational conditions (flow rate, temperature, pressure, and vacuum) and design (number of membranes) based on Aspen Plus™ software. The efficiency maximization resulted in a decreasing levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from 8.29 €/kgH2 in the methanol system to 6.12 €/kgH2 in the ammonia system and ultimately to 5.43 €/kgH2 in the methane system, with associated thermal efficiencies of 0.57, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively, at the fuel processor level. At the genset level, the reduction was from 1400 €/MWh in the electric methanol system to 848 €/MWh and 665 €/MWh in the electric and thermal ammonia systems, and finally to 627 €/MWh in the methane system, with corresponding electric efficiencies ranging from 25% to 38%. From an economic point of view only, methane would be the preferred fuel option while ammonia would be the best option from the efficiency point of view. The wide exploitation of these systems is still hindered by high costs compared to traditional ICE engine. A comprehensive cost analysis was performed for the full system with the objective to understand cost drivers and to guide future component development.
AB - The aim of this work is to compare, from an economic viewpoint, the performance of small-scale PEM fuel cell gensets (based on 3 Nedstack™ stacks in series, representing a maximum gross power of 40kWe) that integrate a membrane reactor for three different e-fuels: methanol, ammonia, and methane. To achieve this objective, computer-aided process simulation is deployed to optimize the operational conditions (flow rate, temperature, pressure, and vacuum) and design (number of membranes) based on Aspen Plus™ software. The efficiency maximization resulted in a decreasing levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from 8.29 €/kgH2 in the methanol system to 6.12 €/kgH2 in the ammonia system and ultimately to 5.43 €/kgH2 in the methane system, with associated thermal efficiencies of 0.57, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively, at the fuel processor level. At the genset level, the reduction was from 1400 €/MWh in the electric methanol system to 848 €/MWh and 665 €/MWh in the electric and thermal ammonia systems, and finally to 627 €/MWh in the methane system, with corresponding electric efficiencies ranging from 25% to 38%. From an economic point of view only, methane would be the preferred fuel option while ammonia would be the best option from the efficiency point of view. The wide exploitation of these systems is still hindered by high costs compared to traditional ICE engine. A comprehensive cost analysis was performed for the full system with the objective to understand cost drivers and to guide future component development.
KW - e-fuels
KW - Economic analysis
KW - Gensets
KW - Hydrogen production
KW - Membrane reactor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165236878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.312
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.312
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165236878
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 50
SP - 433
EP - 457
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - Part A.
ER -