Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

Charlotte A. van der Velden (Corresponding author), M.C. van der Steen, Jens Leenders, Florens Q.M.P. van Douveren, Rob P.A. Janssen, Max Reijman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.

METHODS: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.

RESULTS: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).

CONCLUSIONS: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number240
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2019

Keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adolescent
  • Arthralgia/diagnosis
  • Child
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Knee Injuries/complications
  • Knee Joint
  • Male
  • Netherlands
  • Pain Measurement/methods
  • Pilot Projects
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Translations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this