Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

Charlotte A. van der Velden (Corresponding author), M.C. van der Steen, Jens Leenders, Florens Q.M.P. van Douveren, Rob P.A. Janssen, Max Reijman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.

METHODS: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.

RESULTS: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).

CONCLUSIONS: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number240
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2019

Fingerprint

Knee Injuries
Knee Osteoarthritis
Documentation
Knee
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Activities of Daily Living
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sports
Consensus

Keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adolescent
  • Arthralgia/diagnosis
  • Child
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Knee Injuries/complications
  • Knee Joint
  • Male
  • Netherlands
  • Pain Measurement/methods
  • Pilot Projects
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Translations

Cite this

van der Velden, C. A., van der Steen, M. C., Leenders, J., van Douveren, F. Q. M. P., Janssen, R. P. A., & Reijman, M. (2019). Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1), [240]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6
van der Velden, Charlotte A. ; van der Steen, M.C. ; Leenders, Jens ; van Douveren, Florens Q.M.P. ; Janssen, Rob P.A. ; Reijman, Max. / Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child : which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?. In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 1.
@article{1a71cac7aa3441888e67944918799245,
title = "Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.METHODS: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.RESULTS: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75{\%} relevant), adequate construct validity (75{\%} confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75{\%} confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75{\%} relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75{\%} confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40{\%} confirmed hypotheses).CONCLUSIONS: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.",
keywords = "Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Arthralgia/diagnosis, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Injury Severity Score, Knee Injuries/complications, Knee Joint, Male, Netherlands, Pain Measurement/methods, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations",
author = "{van der Velden}, {Charlotte A.} and {van der Steen}, M.C. and Jens Leenders and {van Douveren}, {Florens Q.M.P.} and Janssen, {Rob P.A.} and Max Reijman",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child : which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders? / van der Velden, Charlotte A. (Corresponding author); van der Steen, M.C.; Leenders, Jens; van Douveren, Florens Q.M.P.; Janssen, Rob P.A.; Reijman, Max.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 20, No. 1, 240, 22.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child

T2 - which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

AU - van der Velden, Charlotte A.

AU - van der Steen, M.C.

AU - Leenders, Jens

AU - van Douveren, Florens Q.M.P.

AU - Janssen, Rob P.A.

AU - Reijman, Max

PY - 2019/5/22

Y1 - 2019/5/22

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.METHODS: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.RESULTS: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).CONCLUSIONS: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.METHODS: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.RESULTS: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).CONCLUSIONS: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

KW - Activities of Daily Living

KW - Adolescent

KW - Arthralgia/diagnosis

KW - Child

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Injury Severity Score

KW - Knee Injuries/complications

KW - Knee Joint

KW - Male

KW - Netherlands

KW - Pain Measurement/methods

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Translations

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

DO - 10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 31113406

VL - 20

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 1

M1 - 240

ER -