Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design

L.B. Andersen, P. Danholt, K. Halskov, N.B. Hansen, P. Lauritsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article starts from the paradox that, although participation is a defining trait of participatory design (PD), there are few explicit discussions in the PD literature of what constitutes participation. Thus, from a point of departure in Actor-Network Theory (ANT), this article develops an analytical understanding of participation. It is argued that participation is a matter of concern, something inherently unsettled, to be investigated and explicated in every design project. Specifically, it is argued that (1) participation is an act overtaken by numerous others, rather than carried out by individuals and (2) that participation partially exists in all elements of a project. These traits are explicated in a design project called ‘Teledialogue’, where the par- ticipants are unfolded as networks of reports, government institutions, boyfriends, social workers and so on. The argument is synthesised as three challenges for PD: (1) participants are network configurations, (2) participation is an aspect of all project activities and (3) there is no gold standard for participation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-261
Number of pages12
JournalCoDesign
Volume11
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • actor
  • actor-network theory
  • matters of concern
  • participation
  • participatory design
  • teledialogue

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this