Other minds, other intelligences: the problem of attributing agency to machines

Sven Nyholm (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

John Harris discusses the problem of other minds, not as it relates to other human minds, but rather as it relates to artificial intelligences. He also discusses what might be called bilateral mind-reading: humans trying to read the minds of artificial intelligences and artificial intelligences trying to read the minds of humans. Lastly, Harris discusses whether super intelligent AI – if it could be created – should be afforded moral consideration, and also how we might convince super intelligent AI that we ourselves should be treated with moral consideration. In this commentary, I discuss these issues brought up by Harris. I focus specifically on robots (rather than AI in general), and I set aside future super intelligent AI to instead focus on more limited forms of AI. I argue that the human tendency to attribute minds even to robots with very limited AI and whether such robots should be given moral consideration are more pressing issues than those that Harris discusses, even though I certainly agree with Harris that the potential for super intelligent AI is a fascinating topic to speculate about.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)592-598
Number of pages7
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

artificial intelligence
Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
intelligence
robot
Reading

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Agency
  • Robots
  • Ethics
  • Other minds

Cite this

@article{08423b5b9ae84331b51ef671808439c1,
title = "Other minds, other intelligences: the problem of attributing agency to machines",
abstract = "John Harris discusses the problem of other minds, not as it relates to other human minds, but rather as it relates to artificial intelligences. He also discusses what might be called bilateral mind-reading: humans trying to read the minds of artificial intelligences and artificial intelligences trying to read the minds of humans. Lastly, Harris discusses whether super intelligent AI – if it could be created – should be afforded moral consideration, and also how we might convince super intelligent AI that we ourselves should be treated with moral consideration. In this commentary, I discuss these issues brought up by Harris. I focus specifically on robots (rather than AI in general), and I set aside future super intelligent AI to instead focus on more limited forms of AI. I argue that the human tendency to attribute minds even to robots with very limited AI and whether such robots should be given moral consideration are more pressing issues than those that Harris discusses, even though I certainly agree with Harris that the potential for super intelligent AI is a fascinating topic to speculate about.",
keywords = "Artificial intelligence, Agency, Robots, Ethics, Other minds",
author = "Sven Nyholm",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0963180119000537",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "592--598",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Other minds, other intelligences: the problem of attributing agency to machines. / Nyholm, Sven (Corresponding author).

In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 592-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Other minds, other intelligences: the problem of attributing agency to machines

AU - Nyholm, Sven

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - John Harris discusses the problem of other minds, not as it relates to other human minds, but rather as it relates to artificial intelligences. He also discusses what might be called bilateral mind-reading: humans trying to read the minds of artificial intelligences and artificial intelligences trying to read the minds of humans. Lastly, Harris discusses whether super intelligent AI – if it could be created – should be afforded moral consideration, and also how we might convince super intelligent AI that we ourselves should be treated with moral consideration. In this commentary, I discuss these issues brought up by Harris. I focus specifically on robots (rather than AI in general), and I set aside future super intelligent AI to instead focus on more limited forms of AI. I argue that the human tendency to attribute minds even to robots with very limited AI and whether such robots should be given moral consideration are more pressing issues than those that Harris discusses, even though I certainly agree with Harris that the potential for super intelligent AI is a fascinating topic to speculate about.

AB - John Harris discusses the problem of other minds, not as it relates to other human minds, but rather as it relates to artificial intelligences. He also discusses what might be called bilateral mind-reading: humans trying to read the minds of artificial intelligences and artificial intelligences trying to read the minds of humans. Lastly, Harris discusses whether super intelligent AI – if it could be created – should be afforded moral consideration, and also how we might convince super intelligent AI that we ourselves should be treated with moral consideration. In this commentary, I discuss these issues brought up by Harris. I focus specifically on robots (rather than AI in general), and I set aside future super intelligent AI to instead focus on more limited forms of AI. I argue that the human tendency to attribute minds even to robots with very limited AI and whether such robots should be given moral consideration are more pressing issues than those that Harris discusses, even though I certainly agree with Harris that the potential for super intelligent AI is a fascinating topic to speculate about.

KW - Artificial intelligence

KW - Agency

KW - Robots

KW - Ethics

KW - Other minds

UR - https://philpapers.org/rec/NYHOMO

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072272050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180119000537

DO - 10.1017/S0963180119000537

M3 - Article

C2 - 31526424

VL - 28

SP - 592

EP - 598

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 4

ER -