Optimal manufacturable CNN array size for time multiplexing schemes

Gunhee Han, J. Pineda de Gyvez, E. Sanchez-Sinencio

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    140 Downloads (Pure)


    This paper presents a feasibility analysis to predict the optimal size of VLSI CNN implementations. A 3×3 CNN IC test prototype was designed and fabricated for this purpose. The study considers both the manufacturability and computing performance power of hypothetical large CNN arrays. The manufacturability analysis has been geared towards IC yield prediction using our actual IC layout along with some realistic parameters representing the "cleanliness" of the manufacturing line. Additionally, from experimental results we have found that offset effects are dominant and if they are not properly canceled they can produce incorrect processing results. As a one-on-one mapping between image pixels and CNN cells is practically impossible, the computing performance analysis concentrates on the optimal array size needed to efficiently implement a multiplexing scheme versus the hypothetical fully parallel CNN architecture. Our results indicate that a 50×50 array is feasible for a time multiplexing scheme. This array will consume around 4 W. The predicted yield of such array is about 70%. The implementation cost is around 30% of a 100×100 array, or alternatively only 2% of a 200×200 array, and only 0.04% slower than a hypothetical fully parallel processing architecture
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and their Applications, CNNA-96, 24-26 June 1996, Sevilla, Spain
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
    ISBN (Print)0-7803-3261-X
    Publication statusPublished - 1996


    Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal manufacturable CNN array size for time multiplexing schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this