On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology

P.E. Vermaas, C.H. Dorst

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    124 Citations (Scopus)
    8 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this paper we consider the Function–Behaviour–Structure model of designing in the version as developed by John Gero and collaborators. We identify two problems: the absence of a stable definition of function, and the model's double aim of describing actual designing and prescribing improved designing. These problems are not unique to the body of work we are addressing here; they are general problems that design methodologists have been struggling with in the last forty years. We argue that philosophy may help addressing them: it may fix a definition of function and illustrates how descriptive and prescriptive modelling can be distinguished and connected.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-157
    JournalDesign Studies
    Volume28
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this