Abstract
Agent-based computational economics (ACE) combines elements from economics and computer science. In this article, the focus is on the relation between the evolutionary technique that is used and the economic problem that is modeled. In the field of ACE, economic simulations often derive parameter settings for the genetic algorithm directly from the values of the economic model parameters.
This article compares two important approaches that are dominating in ACE and shows that the above practice may hinder the performance of the genetic algorithm and thereby hinder agent learning. More specifically, it is shown that economic model parameters and evolutionary algorithm parameters should be treated separately by comparing the two widely used approaches to social learning with respect to their convergence properties and robustness. This leads to new considerations for the methodological aspects of evolutionary algorithm design within the field of ACE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 162-175 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Computational Intelligence |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On social learning and robust evolutionary algorithm design in the cournot oligopoly game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver