Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys : a comparison of methods

N. Schillewaert, F. Langerak, T. Duhamel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A study reports the findings of a comparison between different non-probability sampling methods applied in a World Wide Web-user-survey. Respondents were recruited in 4 different ways, namely a one-page press release in a weekly business news magazine, newsgroup postings, hyperlinks from other Web sites and an e-mailing. The results indicate the following: 1. Newsgroup postings and e-mailings generate very high speed response. 2. All non-probability sampling methods possess different caveats which force researchers to apply them cautiously. 3. The recruitment methods generate responses of equal quality and completeness, 4. The various recruitment methods are not suited for generating stable results concerning demographic and webographic dimensions of the WWW-user population. 5. The complementary sampling methods allow useful inferences about Web users' attitudes towards the WWW to be made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-322
JournalInternational Journal of Market Research
Volume40
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sampling methods
Sampling
World Wide Web
User attitudes
Demographics
Press releases
Inference
News
Web sites
Completeness

Cite this

@article{c05e1ad918504077a326ac89ef6e2337,
title = "Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys : a comparison of methods",
abstract = "A study reports the findings of a comparison between different non-probability sampling methods applied in a World Wide Web-user-survey. Respondents were recruited in 4 different ways, namely a one-page press release in a weekly business news magazine, newsgroup postings, hyperlinks from other Web sites and an e-mailing. The results indicate the following: 1. Newsgroup postings and e-mailings generate very high speed response. 2. All non-probability sampling methods possess different caveats which force researchers to apply them cautiously. 3. The recruitment methods generate responses of equal quality and completeness, 4. The various recruitment methods are not suited for generating stable results concerning demographic and webographic dimensions of the WWW-user population. 5. The complementary sampling methods allow useful inferences about Web users' attitudes towards the WWW to be made.",
author = "N. Schillewaert and F. Langerak and T. Duhamel",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "307--322",
journal = "International Journal of Market Research",
issn = "1470-7853",
publisher = "Market Research Society",
number = "4",

}

Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys : a comparison of methods. / Schillewaert, N.; Langerak, F.; Duhamel, T.

In: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1998, p. 307-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys : a comparison of methods

AU - Schillewaert, N.

AU - Langerak, F.

AU - Duhamel, T.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - A study reports the findings of a comparison between different non-probability sampling methods applied in a World Wide Web-user-survey. Respondents were recruited in 4 different ways, namely a one-page press release in a weekly business news magazine, newsgroup postings, hyperlinks from other Web sites and an e-mailing. The results indicate the following: 1. Newsgroup postings and e-mailings generate very high speed response. 2. All non-probability sampling methods possess different caveats which force researchers to apply them cautiously. 3. The recruitment methods generate responses of equal quality and completeness, 4. The various recruitment methods are not suited for generating stable results concerning demographic and webographic dimensions of the WWW-user population. 5. The complementary sampling methods allow useful inferences about Web users' attitudes towards the WWW to be made.

AB - A study reports the findings of a comparison between different non-probability sampling methods applied in a World Wide Web-user-survey. Respondents were recruited in 4 different ways, namely a one-page press release in a weekly business news magazine, newsgroup postings, hyperlinks from other Web sites and an e-mailing. The results indicate the following: 1. Newsgroup postings and e-mailings generate very high speed response. 2. All non-probability sampling methods possess different caveats which force researchers to apply them cautiously. 3. The recruitment methods generate responses of equal quality and completeness, 4. The various recruitment methods are not suited for generating stable results concerning demographic and webographic dimensions of the WWW-user population. 5. The complementary sampling methods allow useful inferences about Web users' attitudes towards the WWW to be made.

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 307

EP - 322

JO - International Journal of Market Research

JF - International Journal of Market Research

SN - 1470-7853

IS - 4

ER -